NICOLA Sturgeon’s pro-independence partners at Holyrood have demanded a firm timetable on a second independence referendum, adding to the pressure on the First Minister to name a date.
Patrick Harvie, co-convener of the Scottish Greens, said people in the Yes movement were “impatient” and the SNP government should set out its position “very soon”.
Unionist campaigners claimed the Yes movement was starting to “splinter” at the top.
The First Minister promised last year that she would set out a “precise timescale” on a new vote this autumn, once the terms of Brexit became clear.
But she admitted last week that she may not be able to overcome the UK’s government rigid refusal to grant Holyrood the power needed for a second referendum.
She said if that happened, she would make it an issue at the 2021 Holyrood election and seek a fresh mandate, rather than attempt to hold a wildcat Catalan-style referendum.
Her comments dismayed many in the Yes movement who want a referendum sooner.
Polls suggest Unionist parties are on track to have a majority at Holyrood after 2021, scuppering any chance of a referendum.
At last month’s SNP conference, MP Angus MacNeil said his party mustn’t “dither” like the Jacobites and turn back on the road to victory, as “the opportunity is here and now”.
Speaking to the Herald to mark 10 years as the Greens’ leader at Holyrood, Mr Harvie said he wanted action in the current parliament.
He said: “I don’t know if it will happen within this term. I don’t think anyone would honestly answer that question by saying ‘Absolutely, yes’ or ‘Absolutely, no.’
“I hope that we don’t have to wait too long. I think there’s a great many other supporters of independence, of whichever political party they support, who are starting to get impatient.
“If not impatient for a starting gun to be fired, at least impatient for some kind of timeframe.
“We know now what is in the [Brexit] withdrawal agreement.
“I think very soon now we need to have a sense of what the Scottish Government sees as the next steps forward.”
He said it was unacceptable that Theresa May’s Brexit plan did not give Scotland a voice in Europe, despite Scots voting 62% to Remain.
- READ MORE: Sturgeon admits Indyref2 may be after 2021
He added: “It would good to see that decision [on a referendum] made during this parliament when we know that there’s a clear majority for the principle that it should be for the people of Scotland to make that decision.”
Pamela Nash, chief executive of the anti-independence group Scotland in Union, said: "These comments reveal that the campaign to leave the UK is starting to splinter, creating yet more headaches for Nicola Sturgeon.
"Unfortunately for Patrick Harvie, polls show that the majority of people in Scotland want to remain in the UK, even if we leave the EU with no deal."
Scottish LibDem MSP Alex Cole-Hamilton said: “The Green Party manifesto said they wanted 1m signatures on a petition before reopening the independence question. “Perhaps Patrick Harvie could tell us how many signatures he has got before he starts pushing for another unwanted referendum?”
An SNP spokesperson said: “SNP members are out campaigning for independence, making the positive case for taking Scotland’s future into our own hands - and we welcome the Scottish Greens’ enthusiasm for joining us in making that case.
“Never has it been more obvious that Scotland needs hope for the future with independence to escape the chaos and damage of Brexit.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel