Westminster will not accept a no-deal Brexit, Amber Rudd has insisted in a dramatic intervention in the withdrawal debate.
And the new Work and Pensions Secretary warned that Brexit might not go ahead if MPs rejected Theresa May's withdrawal agreement in a House of Commons vote expected next month.
READ MORE: Theresa May heads to Brussels amid scramble to finalise Brexit deal ahead of EU summit
Her remarks are at odds with those of David Mundell, the Scottish Secretary, who earlier this week insisted that the only choice on offer before MPs was the Prime Minister’s deal or a “catastrophic” no-deal.
Ms Rudd made her comments as Mrs May came under pressure from Tory Brexiteers to secure further concessions from the EU in a top-level Brussels meeting this evening.
READ MORE: Questions over government’s battle to stop Brexit legal case
The PM will meet European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker for talks ahead of the special EU Brexit summit on Sunday at which the remaining 27 member states are expected to approve her plan.
She is under pressure to make changes to the Northern Irish backstop contained in the Brexit divorce agreement, making it clear how the UK can exit the controversial arrangement.
With large numbers of Conservatives, as well as the 10 DUP MPs who prop up Mrs May's administration in the Commons, threatening to vote down her deal, the PM has repeatedly warned that the alternative is a damaging no-deal Brexit.
But Ms Rudd told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "It is my view that the House of Commons will stop no-deal.
"There isn't a majority in the House of Commons to allow that to take place."
The minister, a former Remain campaigner who replaced Leave-backing Esther McVey in the Cabinet following her resignation last week, added: "If it doesn't get through, anything could happen. The Brexiteers may lose their Brexit."
Ms Rudd made clear that she expected MPs to rally behind Mrs May's proposals, telling Today: "I don't think we are looking at another referendum. People will take a careful look over the abyss - MPs of all parties - and consider whether they think it is in the best interests of the whole country.
"The likelihood is, despite what people say, that the Withdrawal Agreement will get through."
But her comments were seized upon by Labour, whose Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell told an event at Reuters in London that there was "an overwhelming majority opposing anything that smacks of being no-deal".
His Labour colleague Sir Keir Starmer said: "Amber Rudd seems to have ignored Number 10's spin by admitting that Parliament would stop a no-deal Brexit.
"If the Prime Minister's deal is rejected then MPs will not sit back and allow us to crash out of the EU without an agreement. Parliament will take back control.
"After these comments from Amber Rudd, it's time for the Government to drop the false choice between a bad deal and no deal, and to come forward with a plan that can command the majority support of Parliament," added the Shadow Brexit Secretary.
Nicola Sturgeon, the First Minister, commented: "Amber Rudd exposes the falsity of the PM's tactics; it is not a choice between her bad deal or no deal. There are better alternatives."
The People's Vote campaign for a second referendum said Ms Rudd had "torpedoed the PM's threat of no-deal".
Labour MP and People's Vote supporter Tulip Siddiq said: "The threat of no-deal was always to try and scare MPs into backing her; now one of the Prime Minister's key remaining allies has blown that fallacy apart, it is time we had a final say. We must have a people's vote on this bad Brexit deal."
Ms Rudd's comments will increase Mrs May's difficulties at what was already expected to be an awkward session of Prime Minister's Questions today, amid mounting evidence of tensions between the PM and the Democratic Unionist Party over the Brexit deal.
The Government caved in to a series of opposition amendments to its Budget-enacting Finance Bill in the latest sign that the DUP's MPs would not support Mrs May's minority administration.
Mrs May's talks with Mr Juncker follow confirmation from No 10 that the Government will look at potential technological solutions to keep the Irish border open.
The PM’s spokesman confirmed that references in last week's draft agreement to "alternative arrangements" for the border could involve technical measures of the kind previously promoted as the "maximum facilitation" solution, or Max Fac.
Brexiteer ministers want her to press for clarity on how the UK can avoid or end the use of the backstop, which would require the whole UK to be in a single customs territory with the EU and force Northern Ireland to align with many of Brussels' single market rules after 2020, unless an alternative is found.
A Brexit-backing minister said the negotiation process was "not over until it's over" and it was now a case of "who blinks first" as Brussels did not want either the backstop to be implemented or the prospect of the UK crashing out without a deal.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel set her face against any change to the deal to give the UK the independent right to end the backstop.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon seeks Commons coalition with Jeremy Corbyn to stop Theresa May's Brexit deal
She told the German Parliament: "We have placed value, and this is right, on the fact that Britain cannot decide unilaterally when it ends the state of the customs union, but that Britain must decide this together with the EU."
Mrs Merkel said Germany would back the proposed withdrawal agreement at Sunday's summit and hoped that objections raised by Spain to the treatment of Gibraltar would be "solved" by this time.
Influential Conservative backbencher Damian Collins, who chairs the Commons Culture Committee, said that he could not back Mrs May's deal as it stood and suggested there should be an election or second referendum if the country faced a no-deal Brexit.
"If we couldn't get an agreement and we were stuck in a situation where it was a deal we don't want, or the cliff edge... I don't think as Parliament we could just stand back and watch the country fall off the edge of a cliff without asking the people whether that was the step they wanted to take," Mr Collins told Today.
Brussels has indicated that the withdrawal agreement, setting out the terms of the UK's divorce from the bloc, will not be rewritten although work is ongoing to flesh out the political declaration on the future UK-EU relationship.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel