Scottish universities are facing a ‘brain drain’ of top research talent in the wake of Brexit, ministers have warned.
Richard Lochhead, the Higher Education Minister, said institutions would no longer be able to attract the best researchers unless international collaborations were safeguarded.
His comments came in a debate at the Scottish Parliament on the “substantial threat” posed by Brexit to the country’s position as a leading nation in international science and research.
He said: “Continuing international collaboration is critical to maintaining and strengthening Scotland’s excellence in research as well as meeting our economic policy goals and improving public services.
“Brexit and the related hostile immigration policies of the UK Government should not be allowed to stymie Scotland’s scientific and economic progress.
“The UK Government does not have a credible plan to ensure that our valuable science and research can be maintained and enhanced following Brexit.”
A Scottish Government report on science and research published this week highlighted the importance of collaboration in international research and innovation programmes.
It said: “As the evidence quoted above shows, the impact of reduced participation in such programmes goes well beyond the funding aspects alone.
“A reduction in European research collaborations and researcher mobility between Scotland and the rest of Europe is likely to lead to a weakening of our research productivity and excellence.
“Participation in European research programmes gives Scottish universities and other organisations access not only to EU funding, but also to collaborative networks, expertise, facilities and data that add immense value to their work.”
The report said around a quarter of all full-time research staff at Scottish universities were EU citizens while many more EU researchers work within the Scottish Government, at research institutes, public bodies and in the private sector.
It concluded: “The continuing uncertainty over the UK Government’s future immigration policy has been damaging, presenting a significant risk to Scotland’s international collaborations and research excellence.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel