Nicola Sturgeon has called on the UK Government to “come clean” on how much Brexit will cost the NHS.
The First Minister claimed millions of pounds could be lost in funding for research trials after leaving the EU.
She pointed to other dangers, such as pharmaceutical companies being told to stockpile medicine in preparation for a no-deal scenario.
Speaking ahead of her speech at the National Cancer Research Institute Conference, the First Minister said: “Far from the £350 million extra a week promised to the NHS from Brexit, there is growing evidence of mounting costs.
“It’s now time the UK Government came clean on the scale of the cost to our health service.
“The Prime Minister failed to guarantee there would be no interruption in medicine supplies after Brexit.
“This came after UK ministers published a truncated tender, at a cost of tens of millions of pounds, associated with medicines stockpiling.
“There is no good Brexit for our health service. Even with a deal we face a loss of millions of pounds in research funding which could hit clinical trials.
“The best way to avoid this damage to the health service is to remain in the EU.
“But short of that, the UK must stay in the Customs Union and Single Market – which is around eight times the size of the UK market alone – to minimise the damage of Brexit and ensure we continue to have access to the high quality frontline and research staff we need.”
She added that the Scottish Government is doing all it can to mitigate the expected damage Brexit could cause the NHS.
A spokeswoman for the UK Government’s Department of Health and Social Care said: “The Government is confident of reaching a deal with the EU that benefits patients and the NHS – but we are preparing for all situations and we are working closely with partners to ensure the proper provision of all medicines in the event of a no deal Brexit.
“The department is working closely with pharmaceutical companies to minimise costs and we have received good engagement from the industry so far.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel