SCOTLAND’S booming tourism industry is fuelling an unproductive, low-wage economy, the head of an advisory body has said.
Professor Alan Manning, chair of the Migration Advisory Committee, said the hospitality industry had been good at creating lots of jobs – but few were of a high quality.
He said: “Every extra job that’s in the hospitality industry, on average, makes the UK a lower wage, lower productivity economy."
Critics accused him of being “arrogant and dismissive” towards a sector worth £11 billion to Scotland.
The MAC, an independent public body that advises UK ministers, previously recommended a post-Brexit immigration policy focused on high-skilled workers with salaries of at least £30,000 a year.
However Scotland’s hotels and restaurants warned this could lead to “crippling” staff shortages. Bosses said restricting workers from the EU would even drive some firms out of business.
Mr Manning, who is a professor of labour economics at the London School of Economics, insisted it is important hospitality competes for labour on the same basis as other sectors, and suggested its growth should be restricted.
Speaking to Holyrood’s tourism committee, he argued most EU migration had been in lower-skilled jobs since 2004.
He said: “Many of the jobs in hospitality would not be eligible under our proposals.
“The hospitality sector has been fantastic in creating lots of jobs, and quantity of jobs, but it’s not been very good at creating quality jobs – 95 per cent of jobs in hospitality pay below average earnings.”
He added: “If we want to move towards a high wage, high productivity economy, hospitality as it runs at the moment – which pays really rather low wages – is not obviously a sector that you want to encourage in terms of growth.
“What our view is, is that since 2004 they found it rather easy to grow. Our proposal is that growth should not be so easy in the future. It’s about restricting growth, not sort of getting rid of what there is already.”
Mr Manning continued: “If you talk about what the sectors are that we want to grow as a share of employment in the UK, you would not be focusing on hospitality as one of those sectors."
He said it was “not obvious” migration had contributed to making Scotland a high wage, high productivity economy.
And he argued the hospitality industry needed “a little bit of pressure” to boost its productivity and provide better paid jobs. Making migration harder would be “an appropriate nudge” to go down that route, he said.
Kate Nicholls, chief executive of UK Hospitality, said it was “utterly incredible” to hear Mr Manning belittle the jobs of those who work in the sector.
She said: “Mr Manning’s comments on the quality of jobs in the hospitality sector are arrogant and dismissive of the great work we do.
“The sector is incredibly dynamic and vibrant. We provide jobs in every region in Scotland and across the UK create £130 billion in economic activity and pay £39 billion in tax.”
She said Mr Manning is “is very welcome to contact us directly, so we can arrange for him to work a shift in a hospitality business, so he can experience first-hand the brilliant work that goes on in our vibrant sector”.
Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Tavish Scott said it was a “bizarre suggestion that restricting immigration would do anything other than devastate firms and hotels across the country”.
Meanwhile, SNP MSP Stuart McMillan said Mr Manning’s evidence to the committee “personifies the Tories’ view that they can do whatever they want to Scotland in order to placate the hard-line Brexiteers who hold their government to ransom”.
A VisitScotland spokesman said: “Tourism is more than a holiday experience but the heartbeat of the Scottish economy.
“Worth £11 billion to Scotland, it touches every community, generating income, jobs and social change.
“With more than 25,000 EU national workers – around 16% of employees – in the sector, they are a vital part of the tourism industry and their contribution should be celebrated rather than discouraged.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel