TRAVELLERS to Europe face “travel chaos” if there is a no-deal Brexit, Opposition politicians have warned following the release of more UK Government contingency papers.
The final batch of 104 technical notices warns cross-border rail services, including Eurostar ones to the continent, could be suspended without specific agreements with France and Belgium.
Eurostar, which runs around 40 direct services a day, via the Channel Tunnel, from London to Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam and other destinations, only currently holds a UK licence. It would have to apply for new licences, certificates and authorisations from the EU rail regulator to continue services.
The Government advice states: "Passengers using cross-border services are responsible for ensuring that their insurance and ticket terms and conditions are sufficient to cover possible disruption."
It also explains that the UK is seeking bilateral arrangements with France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Ireland to "facilitate the continued smooth functioning of cross-border rail services".
The notice adds: "Given the large amount of trade and citizens travelling on these services it is in both sides' interests to agree to such arrangements."
Dominic Raab, the Brexit Secretary, sought to reassure travellers, saying they should not put off buying rail tickets as Britain would work with its EU counterparts to ensure they were able to travel and goods could be moved.
But opposition politicians were unconvinced.
Pro-EU Labour peer Lord Adonis, the former Transport Secretary, said any severing of the vital train link between Britain and Europe would hurt thousands of travellers and businesses, who wanted to trade with the continent.
“Brexit,” he declared, “will bring about travel chaos."
Christine Jardine for the Liberal Democrats noted: “Eurostar is a great example of European co-operation and engineering prowess. The fact that no-deal could put it out of service is symbolic of the mess the Government have made of Brexit.”
Among the contingency papers, one warns that the Single Electricity Market on the island of Ireland could cease to operate, hitting consumers on both sides of the border.
Mr Raab stressed even if the bilateral co-operation between London and Dublin on energy did not continue, the UK would be prepared, saying: "We have got interconnectors and the regulatory measures that the Government can take to make sure that Northern Ireland maintains the energy supply it needs."
In response to the technical papers’ release, Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer said UK ministers had “barely scratched the surface” as to what would be necessary in the event of a no-deal and that their contingency planning “won’t reassure anyone”.
Stephen Gethins for the SNP said the latest documents should serve as a "wake-up call" to avoid a hard Brexit.
"If the Prime Minister is serious about protecting the rights of people in the UK, rather than pandering to the extreme Brexiteers within her own party, the UK Government must commit to remaining in the single market and the customs union," said the Fife MP.
Meanwhile, Theresa May tried to reassure her colleagues that she would never agree to a backstop – the arrangement should a trade deal not happen – which "traps" the UK permanently in the customs union.
Mr Raab echoed the point, saying: "The backstop would have to be finite, it would have to be short and it would have to be time-limited in order for it to be supported here.
"What we cannot do is see the UK locked in via the backdoor to a customs union arrangement, which would leave us in an indefinite limbo. That would not be leaving the EU," he declared.
The pledge came amid speculation over possible ministerial resignations if the Prime Minister gave too much ground ahead of a crunch Brussels summit next week.
European Commissioner Guenther Oettinger admitted it “does appear possible there will be a breakthrough" at the October 17/18 summit, confirming Whitehall optimism that a deal is near on the backstop for the Irish border.
- READ MORE: Theresa May insists she would never agree to Brexit deal that 'trapped' UK into permanent backstop
Chancellor Philip Hammond became the first senior Government figure to suggest that the backstop would "probably" have to come into effect for a period.
In Northern Ireland, Nigel Dodds, the Democratic Unionists’ deputy leader, said he expected developments over the weekend "in terms of the Government's own position and the Cabinet".
The DUP is adamant it will not agree to anything which results in the imposition of extra customs or regulatory checks between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.
Sammy Wilson, its Brexit spokesman, urged Mrs May to show the EU negotiators “the door.”
He added: "She has declared herself to be a Unionist, she has repeated that time and time again, she knows the consequences if she walks away from that promise, not just for Northern Ireland because, of course, she will open a Pandora's box in Scotland as well.”
Yet the EU is mounting fierce resistance to any backstop time-limit while Leave-backing ministers are insistent the end of the arrangement should be more precisely defined than the vague term "temporary".
Simon Coveney, Ireland’s Foreign Minister, insisted the backstop should be able to remain in place "unless and until something better comes along". He said having a time-limited backstop would be a "deal breaker".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel