SCOTTISH university chiefs are calling for legislation to clamp down on essay mills and other forms of online cheating.
The principals of Glasgow University and St Andrews University are part of a national campaign on the issue with more than 40 UK institutions.
The group has written to Westminster Education Secretary Damian Hinds calling for companies who offer essay-writing services to be made illegal.
As many as one in seven recent graduates may have cheated by using “essay mills” during the last four years, according to a recent study.
Students who get caught face punishment, including possible disqualification.
However, unlike traditional plagiarism, essay mills provide students with bespoke, original pieces of work which cannot easy be detected by anti-plagiarism software.
Companies offering bespoke essays regularly advertise online, on social media, near university campuses and even on public transport.
The letter, signed by Professor Sir Anton Muscatelli, principal of Glasgow University, and Professor Sally Mapstone, principal of St Andrews University, says the services should be targeted.
It states: “Essay mills undermine the integrity of UK higher education and are unfair to the vast majority of honest, hard-working students.
“This form of cheating is particularly hard to detect and, whilst universities must continue to do their part, it is clear to us the time has come for the Government to give legislative backing to the efforts to shut down these operations.
“Legislation will not be a magic bullet. It is, however, a vital part of the broader package of measures.
“Most importantly, it will send a clear statement to the global higher education sector that the integrity of a UK degree is valued by the Government.”
Sam Gyimah, the Westminster Universities Minister, said outlawing the services completely remained an option.
He added: “I also expect universities to be taking steps to tackle this issue.”
Ireland, Australia, New Zealand and 17 US states are already introducing bans.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel