FOR a few minutes in Salzburg the Maybot turned into an exasperated, angry human being.
Eyes jumping from side to side, nostrils flaring and hands gesticulating, the Prime Minister was screaming inside. Her frustration at trying to square the seemingly impossible Brussels circle was clear for all to see.
Perspiring in a sultry press conference room, Theresa May could not hid her anger following the “frank” exchanges she had had minutes earlier with Donald Tusk, the leader of the EU leaders, who publicly and coolly delivered the last rites to her Chequers Plan.
UK diplomatic sources had expected a bust-up but thought it would come at the October 18/19 European Council. The breakdown now at least gives the UK negotiators more time before the very final deadline of mid-November.
The Prime Minister confirmed that the UK was building up a new proposal to unblock the logjam on the Irish border issue.
It is thought this would entail having “regulatory checks” at Irish Sea ports; these are technically different but similar to customs checks. Such checks already exist between Northern Ireland and the British mainland in regard to agricultural products.
The hope must be with this suggestion and the EU’s pledge to “de-dramatise” its own backstop plan, there is a chance that they could meet somewhere in the middle to prevent a hard border with Ireland and avoid a no-deal Brexit.
Yet the key will be not just whether Brussels can accept what many would regard a fudge but also whether the Democratic Unionists, who just so happen provide the PM with her Commons majority, will be able to do so.
The Salzburg rejection now leaves Mrs May looking bruised and battered, seeking friends where few can be found for her compromise. Brexiteers hate it, Remainers hate it, Brussels hates it.
And the timing could not be worse.
In just over a week’s time the Tories gather in Birmingham for what one MP helpfully dubbed a “Brexit bloodbath”.
Various colleagues will be “on manoeuvres,” sensing the smell of political blood, not least Boris Johnson, who has his Chuck Chequers rally before the party leader gives her keynote speech.
Her aides will be making sure there will be plenty of water and cough toffees on the lectern and, instead of letters on the backdrop, there will be a projected message.
If the Maybot can survive the Tory turmoil in Birmingham, there will be just two weeks to reset her plan to try to get the EU27 on board.
Of course, it may be that the old political rouse is being worked here: make things look so desperately bad that when victory is seized from the jaws of defeat at the last moment, the sense of achievement and relief is all the greater.
Or, it could be as bad as it looks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel