CONTROVERSIAL primary school assessments should not cause undue concern, according to an international education expert.
Associate Professor Allison Skerrett, from the University of Texas, made her comments during a visit to Scotland.
The academic sits on on the Scottish Government’s International Council of Education Advisers (ICEA), which was initially sceptical of the assessments.
However, Ms Skerrett said their focus on helping teachers make accurate judgements about pupils could be a model for the rest of the world to follow.
Ms Skerrett said: “If the standardised assessment is used to shame or blame, label or rank schools, that serves no benefit.
“The data isn’t being used in ways that could cause the negative consequences that we were concerned about.”
The academic said it was too early for Scotland to take a decision to scrap the assessments because they were still being developed.
And she urged people to see the P1 tests as a part of larger improvement agenda across the curriculum.
She added: “Regardless of some diversity of opinions in ICEA I can say we generally support the ways in which the assessments have been delivered and the purposes for which they are going to be used.
“If they are used and delivered wisely and well through teacher judgement, with the support of school leaders, then it could give additional insight to teachers into areas in which their students are strong and areas in which they are struggling.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel