THE Sunday Herald has been a constant through the devolution years, adding a distinctive voice to Scotland’s national life.
Since the Scottish Parliament was reconvened in 1999, the paper has kept pace with the ups and downs of Holyrood, and the ever-changing face of Scottish society more broadly – reflecting, reviewing and rethinking the way our nation sees itself at home, and in the modern world.
At that time of momentous change for Scotland, on the cusp of a new millennium, any new kid on the block in our fourth estate had to do something different to prosper. There’s little point in a dozen national titles all looking and thinking the same. The Sunday Herald rose to that challenge and stood out from the crowd. That was, in and of itself, no mean feat.
Launching its first edition just three months before the first elections to a new Scottish Parliament, the Sunday Herald made its intentions clear from the off. It wasn’t there to drift along with the prevailing tide of news reporting. This was to be a Sunday newspaper to be reckoned with. A left-looking voice for a left-looking nation, beginning to rediscover what it could become.
For nearly 20 years it has excelled on many levels, and while we can express sadness as it disappears from our kitchen tables on a Sunday morning, we should celebrate the impact it has had over two decades.
Firstly, the Sunday Herald was visually daring. I can think of few papers whose front page stories are etched in our minds like those of the Sunday Herald. Among the most memorable was that of May 4, 2014, when the paper made political history in becoming the only national newspaper to back Scottish independence. Under the editorship of Richard Walker, it proudly declared its support for Yes above a stylised thistle flanked by saltires, illustrated by the unmistakeable hand of Alasdair Gray. The front cover gave the edition the air of a collector’s artwork, and so it turned out to be.
As momentum moved ever in favour of the Yes campaign, the Sunday Herald’s readership grew each week as it gave a voice to a national movement that had for so long lacked the editorial support of the printed press. But more than that, the paper improved the health of Scotland’s working democracy.
A newspaper subscribed to a campaign of hope made a welcome antidote to the doom and gloom, the scaremongering and the negativity of the campaign being fought by the Better Together establishment.
However, while the Sunday Herald gave a welcome endorsement to the Yes movement, it never ceased holding politicians of all colours to account, not least in its scrutiny of the SNP in government.
From Paul Hutcheon’s investigations, which have made uncomfortable reading for all political parties at times, to David Pratt’s courageous reports from the world’s war zones, to Rob Edwards’ formidable coverage of Scotland’s environmental challenges, the role of Trident and the uncomfortable facts of climate change, its investigative journalism, foreign affairs reporting, and breaking stories have rocked and shaped the landscape of Scottish public life.
Today, as Scotland faces being dragged out of the EU against its will, and as the Tories’ Brexit proposals attempt to throw the whole process of devolution into reverse for the first time in two decades – the people of Scotland need and deserve critical and informative analysis from the print press. We should lament the death of any newspaper, and likewise welcome new titles to the fore as the Scottish Parliament faces its biggest challenge yet. My hope is that, like the Sunday Herald, the new Sunday National can provide a platform for debate and give us food for thought on the many hugely important issues facing Scotland today.
Over the last 20 years, the Sunday Herald has turned over its pages to a diversity of voices, and for that, I thank everyone involved for their service and I wish you well for the future. All the best.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel