ALEX Salmond has been accused of “nasty, vindictive” behaviour and undermining the civil service by the union boss representing the Scottish Government’s most senior officials.
Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA, also claimed Mr Salmond was encouraging his supporters to attack Permanent Secretary Leslie Evans.
Ms Evans oversaw the in-house investigation into Mr Salmond after two women raised sexual misconduct complaints against him in January.
The allegations relate to 2013, when he was First Minister.
When Ms Evans told Mr Salmond last week that the investigation was over and she intended to publicise it, he started legal action against her and the government.
Mr Salmond has repeatedly singled out Ms Evans for criticism, and named her first respondent in his judicial review at the Court of Session to overturn her decision.
READ MORE: Video: Alex Salmond resigns from SNP
Writing in the Times, Mr Penman said Mr Salmond had been investigated by an "impartial civil servant" under a process championed by the current First Minister.
However Mr Penman said Mr Salmond had omitted that from his public comments, and dubbed the process the “Leslie Evans procedure” when it was equally Nicola Sturgeon’s.
He wrote: “It is owned by the Scottish Government and, as Ms Sturgeon herself made clear, she agreed to it in 2017.
“Mr Salmond’s decision to attack the integrity of Scotland’s most senior civil servant is no accident.he would be aware that his supporters would jump on this bandwagon.
“While accused of sexual harassment, a claim he denies, Mr Salmond attacks and threatens with legal action the individual tasked with investigating those complaints.
“As a former First Minister, he knows Ms Evans is duty-bound to investigate complaints. Not only is this nasty, vindictive and deliberate, it also has broad consequences.
“Mr Salmond’s actions undermine the integrity and impartiality of the civil service, thereby damaging the Scottish Government itself. Clearly, it’s a price he believes is worth paying.”
READ MORE: Unions give 'full support' to top official in Salmond case
Ms Sturgeon has repeatedly given her support to Ms Evans in her handling on the complaints, which was dealt with under a new process for former ministers.
Ms Sturgeon, who signed off the system in December 2017, said on Friday: “The Permanent Secretary was absolutely right to ensure that the procedure was applied in this case and she has my full support in having done so.”
Mr Penman’s criticism follows the FDA and two other civil service unions, Prospect and PCS, jointly backing the Scottish Government’s complaints process.
The unions also gave their “full support” to Ms Evans personally.
READ MORE: Iain Macwhirter: Salmond’s determination to clear his name could tear the SNP apart
After meeting Ms Evans to seek reassurances that other complains would be handled properly, they said this week: “The unions are confident that the Scottish Government processes which we negotiated are valid and robust and if any member wishes to make a complaint then they will receive the full support of their trade union.
“We also indicated our full support to the Permanent Secretary personally in leading the process and would encourage any worker with any concerns to come forward.”
A spokesperson for Mr Salmond said: “We are entirely focussed on preparing for Judicial Review in the Court of Session and just not interested in exchanging barbs with Mr Penman.
"Every citizen should uphold the right to test the lawfulness of such matters in the highest court in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel