THE UK and Scottish Governments are being urged to protect motorists from “punitive clean air measures” set to be introduced across the country.
Conservative MP Kirstene Hair, who chairs the FairFuel UK all-party parliamentary group, has written to both Chris Grayling, the UK Transport Secretary, and Michael Matheson, his Scottish counterpart, urging them to take steps to ensure commuters are not unduly punished by the new regime.
She wants them to look at options for introducing an incentive scheme for fuel converters, which would allow motorists to reduce their vehicle’s emissions.
Ms Hair, who represents Angus, pointed to the example set in Germany where the Government and motor industry jointly funded retrofitting diesel vehicles, which initially prioritised areas where low emissions targets were being introduced.
The SNP Government recently set out plans to introduce low emission zones, which, she pointed out, would ban thousands of vehicles from cities such as Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee and Aberdeen.
“With low emission zones set to be introduced as early as 2020, we need the both the UK and Scottish Governments to work with the motor industry to give drivers the option of lowering their emissions through a retrofitting scheme to avoid being punished by new regulations,” said Ms Hair.
“We know this can be done and it is delivering real results in Germany where high-emission diesel cars are retrofitted with emission reduction technology to reduce their environmental impact.
“It is right that we take steps to protect our environment but that cannot come at the expense of motorists, who are already facing increased costs and for who further punitive measures would be deeply damaging,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel