FEWER than one in a hundred mothers in Scotland are having home births despite repeated statements that the option should be routinely available.
Figures obtained by the Herald reveal that just 325 women delivered their babies at home in 2017, equivalent to 0.67% of all births - or two in 300.
It is down slightly from 0.75% in 2013 and Scotland also lags behind England and Wales, where 2.1% of mothers had a home birth in 2016.
The Scottish Government has never set a target for home births but its new maternity agenda, 'Best Start', says women "should be encouraged to consider home birth as an option" if they have had a previous vaginal birth without complications.
Elizabeth Duff, policy adviser for the National Childbirth Trust, said she welcomed that aim but said it could only be delivered with more dedicated home birth midwives and a change in attitudes.
She said: "It's a question of getting the numbers up so that you've got those midwives in place who are experienced and confident in home births, who regard it as a really genuine option and are able to say to the mother 'we've got the staff, we can support you, you'll be fine but if you need a transfer to hospital we can arrange that in a very calm and organised way'.
"There's still a lot of fear that is largely unfounded. It's entirely up to women to make the choice, but I think for some women it's really off-putting that people say things like 'oh, you are brave' or 'wouldn't it be better to be in hospital, just in case'."
In the past five years, only NHS Tayside has seen a steady increase in its home birth rate, from 18 in 2014 to 56 last year. In 2017, 1.4% of mothers in the region had a home birth, more than twice the Scottish average and up from 0.4% in 2014.
The main driver behind the increase was an award-winning pilot scheme in Angus, which increased the home birth rate by ten-fold in a year, and is now being extended to Perth.
Justine Craig, NHS Tayside head of midwifery, said: “The ‘Birthplace Study’ of 2011 provided evidence that home birth is a safe option for women enjoying a healthy, low risk pregnancy.
"It was identified that for women who have previously had an uncomplicated birth, planning to give birth at home or in a midwifery led unit is particularly suitable for them because the rate of interventions is lower and the outcome for the baby is no different compared with an obstetric unit.
“In order to support this choice option fully, NHS Tayside piloted a dedicated home birth team in Angus, fully integrated within the wider team. This team provides all care throughout pregnancy, birth and postnatal period to women choosing a home birth.
“Following this pilot, the number of home births [in Angus] has increased, meeting its goal to increase the home birth rate from 0.3% to 3% within a year.”
Meanwhile NHS Highland has seen the number of women having home births halve from 40 in 2013/14 to 21 in 2017/18, a drop in rate of 1.7% to 0.9%.
The health board blamed the decline on an increase in pregnancies deemed 'high-risk', and therefore unsuitable for births at home or in midwife-led maternity units.
This can include complications such as obesity, a previous caesarean section, or maternal diabetes or epilepsy which require consultant care.
However, a spokesman for the NHS Highland said a "more individualised approach is now under development" in line with the Best Start recommendations.
When the NHS launched 70 years ago, half of mothers in Scotland gave birth at home and only one in a 100 was delivered by C-section, compared to 32% today.
A Scottish Government spokesman said:“Our review of maternity and neonatal care, The Best Start, makes it clear that all NHS Boards must ensure they are able to provide women with a full range of options for where to give birth, including at home.
“Introducing continuity of midwifery care as outlined in The Best Start will offer further support to women to help them make informed decisions related to their care.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel