If recent history is anything to go by the phrase “exceptional circumstances” could mean anything but.
The term has been used to impress upon schools that withdrawing pupils from standardised assessments should only apply in a handful of cases.
That is clearly of benefit to the Scottish Government because any mass exodus would not only prove hugely embarrassing, it would also make the whole process of testing in P1 rather pointless.
What remains to be seen is how parents and schools interpret the phrase.
In 2016 John Swinney, the Education Secretary, allowed schools to use a form of internal assessment called units to give pupils a safety net “in exceptional circumstances”.
In fact, the instruction was comprehensively ignored and some 10,000 pupils were awarded National 4 qualifications as a result of passing the unit assessments.
It remains to be seen whether the current campaign to encourage parents to opt out of the P1 tests will have the desired affect.
Despite concerns over the distress caused to some pupils, other schools have reported no such issues.
However, should parents want to opt out in significant numbers, even after discussing the issue with schools, is it the Scottish Government’s expectation that headteachers will ignore them?
That would be counterproductive to the sort of positive community relations schools are trying to foster.
It would also be an uncomfortable position for the Scottish Government at a time when Education Secretary John Swinney has launched a £350,000 project to encourage parents to get more involved in the day to day life of schools.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here