A BBC radio presenter says he has been sacked by the corporation for planning to stand against Jacob Rees-Mogg at the next general election.
Dr Phil Hammond said he had been assured he could continue to broadcast Saturday Surgery on Radio Bristol after announcing on television in July he had been endorsed by the National Health Action Party to contest North East Somerset.
But after again mentioning he had been chosen as a prospective parliamentary candidate against Mr Rees-Mogg in a tweet on Tuesday, the presenter said he was dismissed from the programme he has fronted for the past 12 years.
The NHS doctor, who is also Private Eye’s medical correspondent, said he was “very sad and a little puzzled” by the decision, which the BBC said was in keeping with its editorial guidelines.
Dr Hammond, who lives in the constituency he plans to contest, said: “I strongly suspect whoever made this decision has never listened to any of my broadcasts.
“Such a sudden decision smells strongly of fear.
“There is no political bias on the Saturday Surgery, just three hours of health and happiness with some live music.”
In a statement on his website, the outspoken medic said the head of BBC Radio Bristol, Jess Rudkin, knew of his intention to stand.
He added that he was “advised that it should not be a problem but that he would have to stand down during purdah” before any election.
He said that doctors are allowed to stand for Parliament or become priests as long as they don’t bring their views to work and he said BBC presenters “should be trusted to broadcast without bias despite their declared political affiliations”.
Jacob Rees-Mogg was first elected in North East Somerset in 2010 and held onto the seat in 2017, with a majority of 10,235.
A BBC spokeswoman said: “Impartiality is at the heart of our journalism. Active political involvement is an area covered by our editorial guidelines.
“Standing as a candidate in an election is a conflict of interest and someone seeking election is unable to continue in this type of editorial role.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel