Jeremy Corbyn’s efforts to build bridges with the Jewish community have been rebuffed by critics as Labour’s anti-Semitism row drags on.
The Labour leader insisted he will root out anti-Semites from Labour and acknowledged mistakes in the way the party had handled the crisis.
But the Jewish Labour Movement said trust had broken down with the party leadership, while the Campaign Against Antisemitism lashed out at Mr Corbyn’s failure to apologise for his own conduct.
Mr Corbyn said the party had been too slow in dealing with complaints and should have consulted the Jewish community before drawing up a code of conduct that failed to fully reproduce an internationally accepted definition of anti-Semitism and its examples.
But he insisted that it was his priority to drive anti-Semitism out of the party for good and rebuild trust between Labour and Jewish voters.
At the end of a bruising week which has seen complaints about his behaviour and a request for the human rights watchdog to investigate the Labour Party, Mr Corbyn said: “No one can, or should, try to dismiss or belittle the concerns expressed by so many Jewish people and organisations about what has been happening in the party I am proud to lead.”
But after three leading Jewish newspapers jointly published a scathing leader column about Mr Corbyn’s party, the Labour leader rejected their “overheated rhetoric”.
However, he acknowledged there was a “real problem that Labour is working to overcome” and stressed that if he became prime minister he would “take whatever measures necessary” to guarantee the security of the Jewish community.
Mr Corbyn acknowledged Labour had been “too slow in processing disciplinary cases of anti-Semitic abuse” but insisted that was changing.
Writing in the Guardian, he said: “Labour staff have seen examples of Holocaust denial, crude stereotypes of Jewish bankers, conspiracy theories blaming 9/11 on Israel, and even one individual who appeared to believe that Hitler had been misunderstood.
“People holding those views have no place in the Labour Party.”
While the number of cases was “few”, Mr Corbyn said “one is too many” and stressed that it was not done in his name.
“Our party must never be a home for such people, and never will be. People who dish out anti-Semitic poison need to understand: You do not do it in my name.
“You are not my supporters and have no place in our movement.”
![A man holds a painting of Jeremy Corbyn that says 'For the many, not the Jew'](http://image.assets.pressassociation.io/v2/image/production/cedd7ec983552364d2ce1a50a4382fe6Y29udGVudHNlYXJjaCwxNTMzNDAyNTg0/2.35715392.jpg?w=640)
The latest flare-up in the long-running difficulties over anti-Semitism was sparked by the party’s new code of conduct.
Mr Corbyn defended the code, although he accepted that the Jewish community should have been involved at an earlier stage.
In the document, Labour failed to fully adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism and all its examples.
Jeremy Corbyn needs to stop hiding & make an abject apology to UK Jews in his own voice. He must adopt @TheIHRA antisemitism definition & all examples. He should expel Peter Willsman. He should stop ridiculous show trials of Hodge/Austin & refer himself to equalities training.
— Board of Deputies President (@BoDPres) August 2, 2018
Seven examples were incorporated entirely along with “the essence” of the other four, he said.
“But I acknowledge that most of the Jewish community, including many Labour supporters, take a different view.
“The community should have been consulted more extensively at an earlier stage – which is why our executive decided last month to reopen the development of the code in consultation with Jewish community organisations and others to address their concerns.”
The differences were “very small” and amount to “half of one example out of 11” in relation to criticism of Israel.
Mr Corbyn said: “It is unfortunately the case that this particular example, dealing with Israel and racism, has sometimes been used by those wanting to restrict criticism of Israel that is not anti-Semitic.”
Mr Corbyn’s article met with a furious response from the Campaign Against Antisemitism.
The group’s chairman Gideon Falter said: “There is no acknowledgement of his own role in this crisis. There is no apology for his anti-Semitic activity in the past, but he has hypocritically condemned as anti-Semitic behaviour that he himself has been guilty of.
“He has again preached to Jews that he is right to have rewritten the international definition of anti-Semitism.
“By his action over the years as well as by failing even now to take on board the full concerns of the Jewish community, we remain convinced that Jeremy Corbyn is an anti-Semite and under his leadership the once anti-racist Labour Party has become institutionally anti-Semitic and an existential threat to British Jewry.”
"Today, other than another article bemoaning a situation of the Party’s own making, nothing has changed. There is no trust left. We find ourselves asking once again for action, not words" pic.twitter.com/jmNDX9Xvqa
— JewishLabourMovement (@JewishLabour) August 3, 2018
The Jewish Labour Movement also rejected Mr Corbyn’s article.
A spokesman said: “There is no trust left. We find ourselves asking once again for action, not words.”
Political opponents seized upon similarities between Mr Corbyn’s article and an earlier response to allegations of anti-Semitism in Labour which was published in April.
This is literally a cut a paste job, it makes no firm commitments, says that Jewish concerns about Labour are overblown, criticises Israel (because Corbyn can’t write about Jews without having a go at Israel?), accepts no culpability.
Yes it’s exceptional, but not in a good way. https://t.co/A0GBsIjqOx
— James Cleverly (@JamesCleverly) August 3, 2018
Tory deputy chairman James Cleverly said it was a “cut and paste job”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel