Hundreds of people took to the streets of Glasgow last night to protest against the eviction of up to 300 asylum seekers as the firm behind the move vowed to press ahead with the lock changes.
With chants of “refugees are welcome here”, the crowd carried placards and banners saying “change the law, not the locks” and “we are all human” as they gathered in the city’s Buchanan Street.
The protest was organised after Home Office contractor Serco notified tenants, deemed failed asylum seekers by the UK Government, that their locks would be changed.
Politicians and charities have pleaded with the firm to suspend its planned evictions and CEO Rupert Soames is understood to have agreed to consider it.
However, a Serco spokesman last night confirmed that they "are not planning to suspend" the proceedings, with the first six eviction notices already served.
A further ten notices - giving a seven day eviction warning - could be issue next week.
It came as Glasgow City Council confirmed it is in the process of setting up a taskforce to respond to the “emerging crisis” in a further letter to Home Secretary Sajid Javid calling for the Home Office to intervene and halt the evictions.
The protest saw charity workers and politicians from Labour, the SNP and the Greens speak out against the move.
Paul Sweeney, Labour MP for Glasgow North East, told the crowd that he had been made aware of a mother and two children who have been served with a seven-day notice, however Serco denied this and said only single males had been served so far.
Robina Qureshi, director of refugee charity Positive Action in Housing, also told the crowd that some asylum seekers were being asked by Serco to sign paperwork they do not fully understand.
Ms Qureshi, who ripped up the paperwork as the crowd cheered, said: “If they don’t sign, they’re being threatened with more people turning up. These letters are the preamble to the seven-day notice letters used to lock people out.”
Serco said it did not recognise this claim.
Ms Qureshi added that a further protest - including the burning of eviction notices - is planned for Saturday outside the Home Office building in Glasgow.
Two asylum seekers, Mirwais Ahmadzai, 27, and Rahman Shah, 32, also plan to go on hunger strike outside the government building from tomorrow morning in protest.
Meanwhile, both the leader and chief executive of Glasgow City Council have written to the Home Office requesting an urgent halt to Serco’s plans, claiming the lock changes would result in a “humanitarian crisis” for Glasgow.
The letter states: “A suspension of the immediate commencement of the programme would enable Glasgow City Council to establish what advocacy and support services are required to enable those asylum seekers affected to fully explore what legal processes or other options remain open to them.”
It adds that the council is setting up a taskforce of council officers and third sector and legal charities to “advise on the level of support we require to put in place and the scale of resources needed”.
Lawyers have also questioned the legality of any such evictions and are working with the local authority to identify those affected with a view to raising legal proceedings.
Historically, lock changes have not been used for those who remain in asylum accommodation despite the Home Office ruling they will not be granted refugee status and stopping their funding.
Mike Dailly, of Govan Law Centre, said: “We are convinced that Serco are proposing to act unlawfully. This is a complex area of law and it’s very unlikely vulnerable people can just be summarily evicted in the way Serco propose.”
Serco said it has been providing housing free of charge and without recompense from the Home Office, in some cases for months, for former asylum seekers.
The company said it is sympathetic to those affected but believes it has been “more than supportive” and has started legal proceedings for repossession as these residents “no longer have any right to continue to live in the property we provide”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel