MOST cases of breast, bowel or lung cancer among the poorest Scots are not picked up until the disease has spread to other organs, new figures show.
Campaigners said the figures were “especially worrying” as patients diagnosed with stage four cancer are much less likely to survive and face more gruelling treatments and side effects.
Breast, bowel and lung cancer are the most common forms of the disease in Scotland, accounting for 43% of cases, but the latest statistics highlight a gulf in detection rates between the most and least affluent parts of Scotland.
While four in five cases among the least deprived patients were picked up before stage four in 2016 and 2017 – in most cases at stage two – among the poorest patients, 30.3% were not identified until it was at the most serious, advanced stage.
Research has shown that people from more deprived background are less likely to take part in routine cancer screening, such as attending mammograms or returning bowel screening kits, but shortages of radiologists have also been blamed for delays in patients receiving the results of key diagnostic cancer tests such as CT and MRI scans.
It comes as charities warned that progress on improving early detection rates in Scotland “has stalled”.
The Detect Cancer Early (DCE) programme was launched by the Scottish Government in 2012 with a target to increase the proportion of patients diagnosed with breast, lung or bowel cancer at stage one by 25% by the end of 2015.
That aim has yet to be achieved, however, and there are fears that after what has been described as"glacial progress" the figures are now going in the wrong direction.
The latest statistics from ISD Scotland - covering 2016 and 2017 - show the percentage of patients diagnosed at stage one has risen by just 8.4% in six years, compared to the equivalent figures for 2010 and 2011. Previous figures, for 2015 and 2016, had shown a 9.1% improvement.
Janice Preston, who heads up Macmillan Cancer Support in Scotland, said: “We are deeply concerned there hasn’t been any improvement in these figures from last year.
"While the DCE campaign was making slow progress, it was previously going in the right direction.
“The picture in deprived communities is especially worrying, with over 30% of people diagnosed at the latest stage compared to under 20% of those in the least deprived areas.
"People diagnosed the latest stage are less likely to survive and more likely to face very challenging treatment and severe side effects if they do."
Across the health boards, the percentage of patients whose breast, bowel or lung cancer was detected at stage one ranged from 22.7% in NHS Grampian to 29.2% in NHS Forth Valley.
In Scotland's largest health board, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, it was 24.4%.
Health Secretary Jeane Freeman stressed that more than a quarter of all breast, lung and bowel cancers are now detected at stage one, and pointed to a 31% increase in stage one diagnoses of lung cancer among the most deprived patients as a sign of progress.
Ms Freeman added: “Screening remains one of the most effective ways to find cancer early and more than £1 million has been committed to health boards and third sector organisations since 2016, through the Scottish Government’s Health Inequalities Fund, to help identify new and innovative ideas to improve screening uptake amongst groups least likely to participate.
“Later this year we will also be launching a new DCE campaign, targeting those in the most deprived areas, to reduce fear around cancer and encourage people to get checked early.
“Overall cancer death rates have dropped by 10.6% over the past 10 years and early detection is vitally important to continuing this trend. We are working to beat cancer, investing more than £100 million in our cancer strategy as well as £14 million earlier this year to support health boards reduce waiting times for endoscopies.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel