US President Donald Trump is open to visiting Moscow — if he gets a formal invitation from Vladimir Putin, the White House has said.
The Russian leader has said he is game for a trip to Washington — but his answer came only after Mr Trump retracted his invitation for a meeting in the autumn.
The awkward back and forth is the latest round of summit drama flowing from the two leaders’ controversial first meeting in Helsinki this month.
It underlines Mr Trump’s eagerness to forge a warmer relationship with Mr Putin, though the Russian president does not appear to share the urgency and Nr Trump’s allies in Washington are watching with frustration.
Mr Trump’s tentative yes to a Moscow trip comes as US politicians are still pushing for details about what he and Mr Putin discussed in Helsinki.
The president has been widely criticised for failing to publicly denounce Russia’s interference in the 2016 US election and appearing to accept Mr Putin’s denials of such activity.
Mr Trump’s response to the criticism – an abruptly announced invitation for a second meeting in Washington in the autumn – got a frosty reception from Republicans in Congress facing tough elections in November. Moscow was lukewarm and did not immediately accept.
US National Security Adviser John Bolton, centre, and President Donald Trump’s chief of staff John Kelly, right (Andrew Harnik/AP)
Then, National Security Adviser John Bolton said on Wednesday that plans for an autumn visit would be delayed until 2019.
He cited special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian election meddling as the reason, using Mr Trump’s favourite term for the probe: “witch hunt”.
But the possibility of a Trump trip to Moscow emerged on Friday after Mr Putin said he was ready to invite the US president — or to visit Washington if conditions are right.
“I understand very well what President Trump said: He has the wish to conduct further meetings,” Mr Putin said while travelling in Johannesburg.
“I am ready for this. We are ready to invite President Trump to Moscow. By the way, he has such an invitation, I told him of this. I am prepared to go to Washington, but, I repeat, if the appropriate conditions for work are created.”
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders responded that Mr Trump “looks forward to having President Putin to Washington after the first of the year, and he is open to visiting Moscow upon receiving a reciprocal formal invitation.”
But it is just talk at the moment.
It is part of “a power game between Putin and Trump”, said Dr Alina Polyakova, of the Brookings Institution. She said the Kremlin basically drove the entire process in Helsinki, and “we’re seeing that again now”.
Mr Trump is hardly in a strong position because “the Helsinki summit was such a fiasco”, said James Goldgeier, of the Council on Foreign Relations.
A Putin visit to Washington between now and January “could have a lot of poor optics”, he said, and “it’s really hard to see the upside” of a Trump trip to Moscow.
The spectacle of Mr Trump in the Russian capital — the site of unproven salacious allegations in an anti-Trump dossier compiled by a former British spy — is likely to raise eyebrows and alarm on Capitol Hill.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (Susan Walsh/AP)
Just two days earlier, politicians from both sides unsuccessfully demanded details of the Helsinki meeting from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who stonewalled nearly all those inquiries at a contentious hearing by maintaining that the president has a right to private conversations.
Since Helsinki, Mr Trump has tried to back-pedal on at least some of his comments.
And Mr Pompeo told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that, despite Mr Trump’s public statements that allegations of Russian interference are “a hoax”, he accepts that Russia did meddle in the 2016 election.
On Friday, Mr Trump met his national security team to discuss threats to the 2018 congressional midterm elections, the first such session he has convened amid warnings from intelligence officials that Russia is again intent on interfering in the US democratic process.
The White House released a statement saying Mr Trump “made it clear that his administration will not tolerate foreign interference in our elections from any nation state or other malicious actors”.
Republican politicians have made it clear they are not eager to see Mr Putin, who intelligence officials say was aware of the 2016 interference, just weeks before Election Day 2018.
Mr Putin “will not be welcome” at the Capitol, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters.
House Speaker Paul Ryan said invitations to the Capitol are reserved ‘for allies’ (J Scott Applewhite/AP)
House Speaker Paul Ryan said such invitations are reserved “for allies”.
The Republican leaders appear to be increasingly relying on public signals, rather than private phone calls or Oval Office chats, to catch the White House’s attention and communicate with Mr Trump — especially when they are at odds with the president’s approach or policies.
Mr Ryan has said he did not speak to the president in the days after the Helsinki summit.
Moscow has portrayed its tensions with Washington as a result of Mr Trump being handicapped by domestic political disputes and a widespread “Russophobia” perpetrated by holdovers from the Obama years – echoing Mr Trump’s penchant for blaming his predecessor for many problems.
By saying that he is willing to go to Washington if conditions are “appropriate”, Mr Putin underlines that stance and effectively puts pressure on Mr Trump to try to stamp out opposition.
His invitation for Mr Trump to come to Moscow – whether the invitation has been formally tendered or is only in spirit – also appears to pressure the US president to show whether he is bold and disruptive enough to buck intense criticism at home.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel