A SENIOR SNP MP has been criticised after defending his party’s decision to bring down James Callaghan’s 1979 Labour Government, ushering in more than a decade under Margaret Thatcher.
Tommy Sheppard, the SNP’s Cabinet Office spokesman, told a Westminster debate: “In retrospect, I would have done exactly the same thing.”
Labour’s shadow Scottish secretary Lesley Laird insisted his statement was “proof that in the SNP's blinkered worldview, the pursuit of independence will always come ahead of the economy, ahead of jobs and ahead of people in their list of priorities”.
She said: "To suggest that Thatcherism was a price worth paying to inflict a defeat on the Labour Party removes all pretence that the SNP are a party of the centre left.
"Workers in Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath, and in constituencies across Scotland, know only too well the human cost of Tory rule through the 80s and 90s – job losses, communities ripped apart, deindustrialisation and a legacy of neglect.
“To say that even with the benefit of hindsight you would do the same again is astonishing.”
Mr Sheppard made the remark during a debate on “strengthening the Union”.
He said Labour MP George Cunningham had “frustrated” 1979’s devolution referendum by pushing an amendment which required 40 per cent of the total electorate to vote in favour.
He added: “The Labour administration, in the midst of economic chaos in the spring of 1979, had the opportunity to go ahead and legislate with the will of the Scottish people expressed at the ballot box, but they declined to do so.
“Given that the administration were on their last legs, the SNP MPs decided to withhold confidence from them. In retrospect, I would have done exactly the same thing.”
All 11 of the SNP’s MPs supported a vote of no confidence in Mr Callaghan’s Government in 1979, forcing a general election which was won by Mrs Thatcher’s Conservatives.
Labour did not return to power for 18 years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel