ANALYSIS
AS the UK Government’s Brexit strategy lurches from farce to crisis it is worth reflecting on the record of the former Prime Minister, whose decisions have led the country to a potentially ruinous "no deal" departure from the EU.
David Cameron quit Downing Street within days of finding himself on the losing side of the 2016 referendum and has barely been seen since. How will history judge his six-year tenure?
Political leaders are obsessed with their legacy. Dick Morris, who advised Bill Clinton in the 1990s, recounted a chat with his ex-boss about what it took to be considered a great president. Clinton was disappointed to hear he only had a shot at the “second tier”, which he never made.
Grading the 14 individuals who have entered and left Downing Street since the Second World War is not an easy task. Reaching agreed criteria is impossible and judgments tend to be clouded by ideological preferences. But here goes.
Leaders in the “tier one” category are Prime Ministers who were able to push through radical changes which were subsequently accepted by voters and the Opposition.
Two PMs stand out: Clement Attlee, whose administration gave the country a welfare state and the NHS; and Margaret Thatcher, whose economic reforms fundamentally changed the UK. You do not have to agree with either figure to accept they were transformative leaders.
Edward Heath can lay claim to being in the second tier. Despite getting kicked out of office after one term, the “Grocer” was determined to take Britain into the European Economic Community, an ambition he achieved.
Tony Blair is a middle rung Prime Minister. His Government made substantial progress in reducing poverty, strengthening public services and reforming the constitution, but Iraq knocked him down. Tory Harold Macmillan, who watched the shop as Prime Minister for six years, and Labour’s Harold Wilson, are also at this level.
Then you have the “fag end” PMs, those leaders who either seemed at the mercy of events, or were destined to lose elections. Gordon Brown is a good example, as was Jim Callaghan and the hapless John Major. Churchill’s short stint in the early fifties was also unmemorable.
The stragglers are at the bottom. Tory Alec Douglas-Home was a nonentity and departed after less than a year. Anthony Eden’s inglorious spell in charge was scarred by the Suez Crisis.
Cameron should fear the wrath of history. He had six years in office – longer than Attlee and Heath – but his legacy will be defined by leaving the EU, a move he feared would be a disaster.
Consider why this happened. Other than for political obsessives on the right, an in/out referendum was only cited as a priority by a tiny proportion of voters. Cameron foisted a trainspotter issue that divided his party onto the whole country.
And during the referendum, when Boris Johnson and Michael Gove made outlandish claims about the so-called Brexit dividend, he kept quiet for fear of splitting the Tories. At all times, Cameron put party above country.
Danny Dyer, an actor in EastEnders, summed up our reclusive former Prime Minister: “Where is he? He’s in Europe, in Nice with his trotters up. Where is the geezer? I think he should be held accountable for it. T**t.”
Cameron was an effective opposition leader who took his party into power for the first time this century. For that the Tories should be grateful. But a three star MP became a one star Prime Minister. At least Douglas-Home didn’t do any damage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel