Donald Trump has rejected Vladimir Putin’s offer to allow the US to question 12 Russians accused of interfering in the 2016 election.
In return, Mr Putin wanted permission for Russia to interview Americans the Kremlin accuses of unspecified crimes.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the proposal was “made in sincerity” by the Russian president but Mr Trump “disagrees with it”.
She said the US hopes Mr Putin will have the Russians indicted on charges brought by the US Department of Justice “come to the United States to prove their innocence or guilt”.
The White House rejected Mr Putin’s offer as the Republican-controlled Senate prepared to issue a rebuke to Mr Trump by going on record against the offer. After Mr Trump backed down, the Senate cancelled the vote.
Mr Putin made what Mr Trump called an “incredible offer” during a joint press conference concluding their summit in Helsinki, for which Mr Trump received bipartisan condemnation at home.
The White House had said on Wednesday it was under consideration, even though the State Department called Russia’s allegations against the Americans “absurd”.
In an interview with The Christian Broadcasting Network on Thursday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said “that’s not going to happen”.
“The administration is not going to send, force Americans to travel to Russia to be interrogated by Vladimir Putin and his team,” Mr Pompeo said.
The Russian claims against the Americans, including former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, involve allegations of fraud and corruption.
Congressional Republicans have criticised the White House for even considering the offer, while Mr McFaul has called it a “ridiculous request from Putin”.
Pushing back against criticism of his Putin meeting, Mr Trump said on Thursday he wants another meeting with Mr Putin to start implementing ideas they discussed in Helsinki, casting the summit as a starting point for progress on a number of shared concerns.
Mr Trump also accused the news media of trying to provoke a confrontation with Moscow that could lead to war, although concerns about the meeting have been raised by a broad cross-section of Republicans and Democrats.
Mr Trump tweeted a list of topics discussed at the summit, including terrorism, security for Israel, Middle East peace, Ukraine, North Korea and more, and wrote: “There are many answers, some easy and some hard, to these problems… but they can ALL be solved!”
“I look forward to our second meeting so that we can start implementing some of the many things discussed,” he wrote. Mr Trump also met Mr Putin last year in Germany and Vietnam.
Despite the bipartisan criticism, Mr Trump pointed blame at the media, tweeting: “The Fake News Media wants so badly to see a major confrontation with Russia, even a confrontation that could lead to war. They are pushing so recklessly hard and hate the fact that I’ll probably have a good relationship with Putin. We are doing MUCH better than any other country!”
“The Summit with Russia was a great success, except with the real enemy of the people, the Fake News Media,” he tweeted.
Numerous lawmakers have criticised Trump for his post-summit statements raising doubts about Russia’s interference in the 2016 US elections, and past and current intelligence community officials also differed with many of his statements.
Mr Putin, in his first public comments about the summit, told Russian diplomats on Thursday that US-Russian relations are “in some ways worse than during the Cold War,” but that the meeting with Mr Trump allowed them to start on “the path to positive change”.
“We will see how things develop further,” Mr Putin said, evoking unnamed “forces” in the US trying to prevent any improvement in relations and “putting narrow party interests above the national interest”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel