FRESH questions have been raised over the murder of Marion Gilchrist in Glasgow more than 100 years ago.
Oscar Slater was sentenced to hang for bludgeoning the wealthy spinster to death in December 1908, yet many have held the view that his conviction was tainted.
Indeed, novelist Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was among those convinced that the accused had been innocent. The Sherlock Holmes author is said to have called upon his own detective skills to try and clear Slater's name.
Now, New York Times journalist Margalit Fox has taken another look at the case and questions the validity of the prosecution's key witness: handmaid Helen Lambie.
Miss Lambie left Miss Gilchrist's address for only 10 minutes, to buy her employer an evening paper. On returning home, she saw a well-dressed gentleman leaving the flat.
Author Margalit is convinced that Lambie recognised the gentleman and had not been entirely honest, or at least doubted what she saw.
Margalit explains: "Lambie was very secretive and unforthcoming in terms of talking about the case. In 1927, she released a newspaper statement recanting her testimony, but a short time later she recanted her recantation."
The author examined letters between Lambie and her mother and formed the view that Lambie was becoming "more and more invested in persuading herself of Slater's guilt".
Slater was blamed for the murder in what was described as a robbery gone wrong. Although there was a great deal of precious jewellery in the flat, only one item was missing: a diamond brooch.
He was sentenced to death on May 27, 1909; however, 48 hours before he was due to meet his fate, his sentence was reduced to life imprisonment with hard labour.
Following years of campaigning and investigating from Conan Doyle, the Secretary of State for Scotland authorised Slater's release on November 8, 1927
Slater was given £6,000 upon his release but refused to share his compensation with those who fought for him, including Conan Doyle. The Sherlock Holmes novelist later took him to court.
Margalit read about the case and began her own investigation, culminating in the book: Conan Doyle for the Defence, where she argues the true killer's identity was lost with the death of Lambie in 1960.
She concludes: "If I had to ask her one question it would be who she saw that night. The evidence suggests she recognised the man who left the flat. Helen told Miss Gilchrist's niece that she saw the man and that it was a highly-placed member of Glasgow society."
In 1914, city detective John Trench released documents which showed his colleagues had doctored evidence and suppressed the name of the suspect, thought to be a doctor, from witness statements.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel