The family of a woman who died from a cancer caused by asbestos are set to be awarded more than £360,000 in compensation.
The relatives of Winifred Thacker sued her former employer North British Steel Group Ltd after she passed away aged 67 from Mesothelioma in September 2014 .
Mrs Thacker, of Armadale, West Lothian, was an office worker at the firm's foundry in the town between 1963 and 1968.
Her family maintained that whilst working there, Mrs Thacker was exposed to high levels of asbestos dust which caused her to fall seriously ill in later life.
Their lawyers told judge Lady Wise at the Court of Session in Edinburgh that her bosses didn't do enough to protect Mrs Thacker from exposure to the deadly substance.
READ MORE: 167 schools throughout Glasgow contain asbestos
The court heard that during the 1960s, businesses had knowledge that being exposed to asbestos was harmful to people.
In a judgment issued on Wednesday, Lady Wise ruled in favour of the family and declared that they should receive compensation.
She wrote: "In the present case, I have found that the deceased was directly exposed to significant quantities of dust, including asbestos dust, until she ceased employment in 1968.
"Accordingly, between the end of 1965 and the termination of her employment with the defender in 1968, the defender knew or ought to have known that any exposure to asbestos dust was likely to be injurious to Mrs Thacker.
"I conclude that the defender breached the duty to the deceased during that period by failing to take any steps to reduce or negate her exposure.
"The failure to provide a mask to Mrs Thacker (or to take steps to see to it that masks were worn by all employees) is a sufficient basis to find that no reasonably practicable steps were taken to protect employees such as the deceased."
READ MORE: Campaigners hit out over asbestos in schools
The judgement tells of how the lawyers in the case had agreed that Mrs Thacker had died from Mesothelioma.
The lawyers argued before Lady Wise on the subject of whether Mrs Thacker was exposed to substantial quantities of dust during her time at the foundry.
Mrs Thacker fell ill with the cancer in April 2014. Doctors diagnosed the condition in August 2014 and she passed away the following month.
Evidence was led before the court that despite working in an office at the foundry, Mrs Thacker was exposed to large amounts of asbestos dust.
The court also heard that bosses at the foundry didn't force their staff to wear masks to shield them from the asbestos.
And Lady Wise also heard that by the mid 1960s, scientists concluded that people should take care when working in close proximity to the substance.
Lady Wise concluded that Mrs Thacker's employers didn't do enough to protect her.
Mrs Thacker's husband John, her daughter, granddaughter, and sister raised the action in court.
Lawyers in the case agreed at the start of proceedings that if the judge ruled in favour of the family, compensation should be set at a total of £360,000.
READ MORE: Asbestos expert warns ageing population will drive surge in mesothelioma deaths
However, the final settlement maybe higher as Lady Wise will now consider legal submissions about whether interest should be added to the sum.
She wrote: "In conclusion, I find that the pursuers succeed as they have proved that the processes undertaken in the defender's foundry during the period of the deceased's employment there created substantial dust, including asbestos dust to which the deceased was regularly and frequently exposed.
"Her exposure was to an extent likely to be injurious to her. That injury was reasonably foreseeable and the defender did nothing to prevent it.
"The quantum of damages is agreed. Interest requires to be added to the sums. Accordingly, I will fix a hearing so that I can be addressed on the precise sums to be awarded in the decree in the pursuers' favour and also on any question of expenses, which I meantime reserve."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel