FACEBOOK and Google took steps to prevent foreign involvement ahead of Ireland’s vote on abortion last month.
On May 8, Facebook started to block ads related to the referendum that didn’t originate from advertisers in Ireland.
A day later, Google announced it would suspend all ads related to the referendum. They were blocked until Irish voters went to the polls on May 25.
Ireland voted overwhelmingly to overturn the abortion ban by 66.4 per cent to 33.6 per cent.
Both sides spent heavily on online advertising, capitalising on the power of social media advertising to directly target voters without the message being mediated by traditional news outlets.
However, the referendum prompted Facebook and Google – both of which have large workforces in Dublin – to keep a close eye on online campaigns.
The bans prevented paid messages relating to the referendum from appearing on its services, which dominate many aspects of online advertising.
In April, Irish data protection commissioner Helen Dixon had said it was possible that foreign organisations could try to sway the referendum.
Ireland's electoral laws ban foreign organisations from funding campaign groups in the country.
However, social media sites and search engines are not prohibited from carrying foreign-funded advertisements.
There has been mounting pressure on social media companies for greater transparency, following revelations over who is behind political advertising campaigns and how they target the public.
Claims that Cambridge Analytica used data gathered from millions of Facebook profiles, and that Russia-backed advertising influenced the US presidential election, have led to fears that political campaigning on social media could be a threat to democracy.
In Ireland, there were complaints from local groups that foreign campaigners with big budgets were trying to sway the vote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here