SHE was teaching on the other side of the world. But still Sonia Zhao felt the oppressive weight of China's authoritarian rulers in her classroom.
The 25-year-old was working in Canada for one of hundreds of Confucius Institutes for Chinese language and culture still mushrooming around the globe in recent years. As someone who followed Falun Gong, a controversial spiritual practice persecuted in her homeland, Ms Zhao knew she could be in trouble, even in Ontario. And, so, she feared could her family back in China.
Her story was recently told for the first time in Scotland, the country with the world's highest concentration of Confucius Institutes, in the Edinburgh screening of an award-winning documentary.
In the Name of Confucius by Chinese-Canadian filmmaker Doris Liu was premiered at the city chambers in the capital amid growing concern - here and abroad - about both academic freedom at Communist-run and funded teaching centres.
Trailer for In The Name of Confucius
Ms Zhao left the now closed Confucius Institute at McMaster University in Canada in 2011 and claimed asylum in 2011. But her's - thanks to Ms Liu's film - is one of the few voices of a Confucius Institute (CI) teacher to be heard freely.
Her words echo those of critics of CI from groups like Falun Gong, Tibetans and Taiwan who say they are written out of lessons on China.
Protests against Confucius Institute in Canada, still image from In The Name of Confucius
Ms Zhao told the film: "I was instructed to avoid talking about Tibet and Taiwan, If I could not avoid mentioning these, I was to change the topic. If students chased me for an answer, I was told that I must say Tibet and Taiwan belong to China. I think that this violates freedom of speech."
Ms Zhao said she had an "an official script" to use in classrooms. She also said she had to sign a contract that prohibited her from being a member of Falun Gong. She said: "It was shocking to see Falung Gong mentioned in the contract. I had been hiding my beliefs for many years. I was really scared."
BACKGROUND: Why China is pleased with Scotland's Confucius drive
Ms Liu in her film recorded how one major school board, Toronto's, pulled out of its CI deal. Evidence included textbooks - spotted by Chinese-speaking parents - full of Maoist rhetoric. She also challenged bureaucrats backing other Canadian CIs to say defend the institutes' 'dscriminartory' employment practices. The film records one Canadian woman behind a CI in British Columbia dismiss her concerns as "xenophobia".
But In the Name of Confucius, which was also shown to an audience at the House of Commons this month, also cited Chinese officials behind blunt about the purpose of CIs. Xu Lin, of Hanban, the body which funds CIs and with which the Scottish government and Scottish universities co-operates, was shown on Chinese TV explaining their role. Xu said: "We send the teachers. We send the textbooks. It's like the foreign universities work for us. CIs, as many people say, are an important part of our soft power."
Scottish authorities, which began working with Hanban under Labour and have continued to do so for a decade, have always claimed that all teaching must reach Scottish standards.
Ms Liu, speaking to The Herald, said tactics for CIs could vary from country to country but that they would always seek influence. She said: "I am a film-maker, not an activist, but I think the Scottish Government should look seriously at what is happening in other countries and take this matter seriously."
Doris Liu interviews Sonia Zhao
American senators of both parties this month again ramped up concern over Chinese actions on campuses across the US, which is currently under an FBI investigation. Former presidential candidate Marco Rubio, a Republican, said CIs had “consistently been used as a way to quash academic freedom on campus at the behest of a foreign government". He added: "I would encourage every college in America to close them." Authorities in New South Wales, Australia, in May announced they would be reviewing their relationship with Hanban. As they made their announcement a new CI opened in Uruguay.
In Ms Liu's film, a leading Canadian academic set out what he saw as the issue: money. Terry Russell, a China expert at the University of Manitoba, said: "The fact is most university administrations want to be pragmatic. They see the money. They want to go get it.
"Until something like the Sonia Zhao case comes up in their backyard, they are not going to do anything about it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here