GORDON Brown has warned Theresa May could be replaced by a new Tory Prime Minister if she loses a crunch vote on Brexit this week.
The former Labour PM said the current occupant of Number 10 could be turfed out by defeat over the EU Withdrawal Bill, which returns to the Commons on Tuesday and Wednesday.
However Mr Brown said the fixed-term parliament act would make it possible for the Tories to stay in office, rather than face a general election, after Mrs May was replaced.
The government has accepted just one of 15 amendments made to the Withdrawal Bill in the House of Lords, and is now fighting to reverse or water-down the rest.
Around a dozen pro-EU Tory rebels voting with Labour, the LibDems and SNP could inflict defeats on key amendments on the customs union and a meaningful vote on Brexit.
The first would commit the government to informing parliament of steps taken to negotiate a customs union, while the latter would empower parliament to reject the final Brexit package and send the government back to the EU negotiating table.
There is also a vote on whether the UK should stay in the single market via membership the European Economic Area (EEA) after leaving the EU.
Research highlighted by the Open Britain group said staying in the customs union but not the EEA - which is Labour’s position - could cost Scotland’s economy £2.2bn a year by 2030.
Asked what would happen if the Government lost the customs union vote, Mr Brown told BBC One's Andrew Marr Show: “There is potentially the chance of a change of Prime Minister, but I don't think at that point they will want to give up as a Government, and I think the five-year parliament makes it possible for them to survive.”
He said that if parliament rejected the final Brexit deal in the autumn it would be a “point of further crisis”.
Reflecting on his own political shelf-life, he said Jeremy Corbyn was a “phenomenon”, but added: “Jeremy himself is going to accept that nobody goes on forever, we're all phases.”
Mr Brown’s warning came after The Observer reported Tory rebels were backing away from defeating Mrs May in case Boris Johnson became PM instead.
One former minister told the paper: “If we were to defeat her on that now, does that further weaken her and give [Jacob Rees-Mogg’s] European Research Group more opportunities to stick the knife into her? That is not where we want to be.”
The Remain-supporting former Home Secretary Amber Rudd also urged rebels to unite in support for Mrs May, saying backing the government was a “no brainer”.
In a joint newspaper article with arch-Brexiter Iain Duncan Smith, Ms Rudd said Jeremy Corbyn would exploit any setback and try “to frustrate Brexit for his own political ends”.
The two wrote: “It behoves us all to demonstrate discipline and unity of purpose in support of the Prime Minister. We cannot allow ourselves to become divided and risk losing the precious chance to go on implementing policies that transform lives."
Former deputy PM Damian green predicted most of the key votes would “pass easily”.
Shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer said pro-EU Tory MPs could alter the direction of the Brexit negotiations by voting with the opposition on the key amendments.
He told the BBC: “There is a real chance for Parliament to bring some order where there is real chaos.”
Former chancellor Ken Clarke said the “meaningful vote” amendment would strengthen Mrs May's hand against Brexit Secretary David Davis and Mr Johnson.
“What we need to do is to rescue the Prime Minister from this terrible treatment she is getting from key members of her Cabinet,” he told the BBC1 Sunday Politics programme.
“We can give Parliament the opportunity of rescuing Theresa from all this and begin to use the parliamentary majority in favour of a softer, sensible Brexit."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel