THE independence blueprint set out in the SNP’s Growth Commission report would be a “continuation of austerity”, the country’s leading economic thinktank has said.
The verdict from the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) is a sharp blow to Nicola Sturgeon as she prepares to face SNP members at the party’s conference in Aberdeen this weekend.
In repeated defences of the Commission report, which has been attacked by the Left of the Yes movement, the First Minister has insisted it would not bring about austerity.
However the IFS said that the plan for public spending growth to trail 1 per cent below GDP growth in order to halve Scotland’s deficit after independence would deliver just that.
READ MORE: 'Don't take up teaching' say majority of teachers
Scottish Labour said the judgment was “humiliating” for Ms Sturgeon, and proved its argument that the SNP was ready to embrace austerity as the price of independence.
David Phillips, the associate director of the IFS, told the Daily Telegraph the Commission’s formula would see public spending fall 3 per cent behind GDP growth after 10 years.
He said: “It’s a continuation of austerity. If public spending growth is 1 per cent less than GDP growth, that’s austerity.”
The state would become a “smaller slice of the pie”, the economist said.
Mr Philips said the Commission’s proposals were “certainly more cautious” than those in the 2013 White Paper on independence jointly launched by Ms Sturgeon and Alex Salmond.
However he questioned why it did not factor in any negative economic impacts arising from independence, yet did refer throughout to the risks of Brexit.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon branded 'delusional' amid Growth report splits
Mr Philips said that if the Growth Commission formula wasn’t considered austerity, then the UK wasn’t going through austerity either - yet it “clearly” was.
He said: “On their definition, we’re not currently in austerity in the UK, but we clearly are, as the state is substantially falling as a share of the economy.”
The Commission, chaired by corporate lobbyist Andrew Wilson, was been repeatedly attacked by the Left of the Yes movement over its tight public spending plans, focus on deficit reduction, and recommendation to keep the pound and be tied to UK monetary policy.
Scottish Labour is now trying to use the report to bracket the SNP and Tories as pro-austerity.
Labour MSP Jackie Baillie said: “This is humiliating for Nicola Sturgeon, who has gone from pretending to be John Maynard Keynes to George Osborne in less than a generation.
“Her so called Growth Commission has been effectively branded a cuts commission by independent experts. Nicola Sturgeon is losing credibility fast by defending this approach.
“With one in four children living in poverty Scotland cannot afford another decade wasted at the altar of deficit reduction.
“The cuts commission declares that Scotland hasn’t had enough of experts, I agree, and those experts are saying the SNP is promising a toxic cocktail of cuts and instability.”
READ MORE: Labour election plan to turn Growth Commission against SNP
An SNP spokesperson said: “The Sustainable Growth Commission report is absolutely explicit in its rejection of austerity and in its recommendation for real-terms spending growth - including an economic stimulus package where necessary - a sharp contrast to the reality of Tory policies being imposed on Scotland.
"What’s more, the fiscal projections in the report are based upon very prudent assumptions on growth, whereas the wider report goes on to make constructive, credible proposals on how to boost growth beyond that level.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel