SCOTTISH Labour are preparing to weaponise the SNP’s Growth Commission report in an early election campaign by saying it proves the Nationalists are ready to embrace austerity.
Labour said the economic blueprint for independence, which has infuriated the Left of the Yes movement, was a “game changer” that would help bracket the SNP with the Tories.
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard told activists in Glasgow he believed an election was “almost certain” as a result of Theresa May’s Brexit plans collapsing this summer.
Scottish Labour would then go into the poll citing the Commission as evidence that the SNP was happy to accept austerity as the price of independence.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson hated 'the Vow' made before 2014's referendum, new book claims
On a broad election footing since 2017, Scottish Labour is currently stepping up its efforts, selecting Westminster candidates for key target seats by July.
A Labour recovery in Scotland, where the party has just seven of the 59 seats, is seen as critical to Jeremy Corbyn’s chances of entering Downing Street.
MSP Neil Findlay, Labour’s campaign spokesperson, said the Growth Commission underscored a “dividing line” between Labour and the SNP on the economy.
He told The Herald: “The Growth Commission report is a real game changer and an eye-opener for many who supported Yes in the referendum because they wanted a fairer, more equal Scotland. That ain’t going to happen under the Growth Commission.
“But it will happen under the Labour party under Richard Leonard and Jeremy Corbyn.”
The 354-page report, which the First Minister commissioned from corporate lobbyist Andrew Wilson, forecasts years of tight public spending to halve Scotland’s deficit after a Yes vote; a cap on corporation tax; and keeping the pound and being tied to UK monetary policy.
It has been called a “suicide note” by a former adviser to Alex Salmond and rejected by a host of voices on the Left of the Yes movement, including the Common Weal thinktank.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon branded 'delusional' amid Growth report splits
Scottish Labour has branded the report a “cuts commission”.
At an event confirming Cowdenbeath MP Lesley Laird as Scottish Labour deputy leader, Mr Leonard attempted to make the report a key wedge issue between Labour and the SNP.
He was scathing about its origins and content, noting it was compiled with the help of 20 business organisations, but not a single trade union.
He said it was “a prospectus based on a hard decade of public spending contraction, and even deeper cuts than those implemented by George Osborne” to cut the deficit.
He said the currency plan was not “sovereignty regained but sovereignty lost… sovereignty lost over interest rate policy, mortgage rate policy, exchange rate policy, inflation policy money supply policy and corporation tax policy”.
He said Labour offered voters hope over austerity, with a redistribution of wealth and power, and a greater role for unions in “interventionist” state economic planning.
READ MORE: New Zealand MP: SNP should be wary of following my country's model
Whereas the SNP Commission represented “a fiscal agenda in thrall to big business and slavishly following the mantra of deficit reduction”, political isolationism, and no space for trade unions or workers’ rights as part of a strategy to promote economic growth.
“That’s not just the Tory vision for the economy - it is now Nicola Sturgeon’s too.”
In a Q&A, he set Labour’s criticisms in context of an early election campaign.
He said Mrs May’s Brexit plan would “almost certainly not command support across parliament” when it was put to a meaningful vote later this year, and be “voted down”.
He said: “At which point I think there would be a constitutional crisis, which would in turn pave the way for a UK general election, and at that general election I would want to see Jeremy Corbyn returned as Prime Minister.”
Mr Findlay said Labour was on a constant campaign footing, adding: “Such is the shambolic state of the Tory party at Westminster, I think the potential is for them to get rid of Theresa May once they find someone they hate slightly less than her. It would be naive for any political party not to be on a campaign footing under the current circumstances.”
Green MSP Patrick Harvie said Scottish Labour’s record didn’t live up to its rhetoric.
He said: “Perhaps one day Labour will unite, prove the polls wrong and beat the Tories at Westminster and finally summon the nerve to do what’s right and help stop the Brexit crisis. However, their record of inaction at Holyrood doesn’t suggest change is coming soon.”
Scottish LibDem MSP Tavish Scott added: “Richard Leonard is right to say that that an independent Scotland would have less money to spend on public services but he's silent on his own party's collaboration with the Tories over Brexit.”
SNP MSP Kate Forbes said: "At a time when the Tories are inflicting austerity on Scotland and newspapers are reporting threats of food, petrol and medicines running out after Brexit, it beggars belief that Labour’s new leader chooses to spend his time peddling the same tired old discredited scare stories about independence – it is no wonder that Labour are still trailing the chaotic and confused Tory party in the polls.
"The Sustainable Growth Commission report specifically rejects austerity - and offers a clear path for how Scotland could be a successful small independent country, using economic powers to drive growth in the economy and invest in public services, and improve the lives of people across Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel