SCOTLAND is failing to meet international targets to prevent wildlife from becoming extinct, according to the latest assessment for the Scottish Government.
An analysis by the conservation agency Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) revealed that current efforts to protect endangered animals and plants are “insufficient” to meet 13 of 20 agreed United Nations (UN) targets by 2020.
Precious habitats are being destroyed and at least 58 species are at risk of extinction, including wildcats, kittiwakes and the great yellow bumblebee. It is unclear, says SNH, whether the Scottish economy “is operating within safe ecological limits”.
On one crucial measure – the need to increase spending to protect wildlife – SNH concludes that “things are getting worse rather than better”. Funding for most of the public agencies tasked with nature conservation has declined in the last five years, it says.
SNH’s own funding has been cut by 26 per cent in real terms between 2012-13 and 2017-18, while budgets for the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and national park authorities have dropped by 11 per cent. Funding for the Forestry Commission in Scotland has fallen by eight per cent since 2013-14.
Scotland failed to meet previous wildlife targets in 2010, and is now committed to 20 targets set by the UN Convention on Biological Diversity for 2020. They are known as the Aichi targets, after the region in Japan where they were agreed.
Scottish Environment Link, which represents 35 environmental groups, is planning to write to MSPs this week to say they are “disappointed” at failures to meet most targets. They also criticise the positive spin put on progress by SNH and ministers.
Craig Macadam, Link’s vice chair and conservation director of an insect campaign group, Buglife, warned that many species in Scotland were “racing towards the cliff edge of extinction”.
He said: “If we are to have any chance of halting and reversing the loss of biodiversity in Scotland and pulling these species back from the edge of extinction we need to be securing their future and the habitats they rely on – rather than repeatedly focusing on the process.”
The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds in Scotland argued that SNH’s analysis downplayed the poor state of Scottish wildlife. “This Aichi assessment should be more a wake-up call, rather than a cause for celebration and complacency,” said the society’s Paul Walton.
“This sort of assessment is hugely important for conservation, but care not to confuse organisational processes with ecological outcomes – and honesty in reporting and public communications – is essential.”
The Woodland Trust said that Scotland could not afford to lose any more of its ancient forests: “These precious sites are increasingly under threat due to development, land use, and climate change,” said the trust’s Arina Nagy–Vizitiu.
“We cannot allow our policies to continue to contradict each other at the expense of nature. Concentrated action is needed to protect these unique habitats and halt biodiversity loss.”
The Marine Conservation Society contended that Scotland’s inshore seabed was “under strain” from fishing. Action was needed to prevent parts of the sea becoming a “marine desert”, it said.
SNH pointed out that Scotland was meeting seven of the 20 Aichi targets. “At this stage there is strong progress in many key areas,” said the agency’s nature director, Sally Thomas.
“There is no room for complacency when it comes to protecting Scotland’s nature for generations to come.”
The environment minister, Roseanna Cunningham MSP, insisted that Scotland was “leading the way” and “on track” to meet 2020 targets: “Our partnership working is delivering real benefits with improvements to our marine environment, peatlands, rivers and woodlands over the last few years,” she said.
“As the target date of 2020 draws closer it’s crucial that public, private, third sector and individuals all continue to work as hard as we can to protect and enhance nature.”
10 species at risk of extinction
Wildcats: As few as 100 left scattered across the highlands because of breeding with domestic cats.
Red squirrels: Historically hounded out by their larger US relatives, grey squirrels.
Puffins: population halved on Fair Isle in the last 30 years, with scientists fearing the same could happen elsewhere.
Great yellow bumblebees: Declined 80 per cent in the last century, now restricted to Scottish islands and in Caithness and Sutherland.
Black legged kittiwakes: Since 2000, breeding birds have declined by 87 per cent in Orkney and Shetland, and by 96 per cent in St Kilda.
Freshwater pearl mussels: Extinct or becoming extinct in 55 rivers, just surviving in 11 rivers.
Fonseca’s seed flies: Only survives on a short stretch of Sutherland coast, a third of which is threatened by a proposed golf course at Coul Links.
Bordered brown lacewings: Only found at Arthur’s Seat in Edinburgh, with fears that a fire in May may have wiped it out.
Northern prongworts: A liverwort confined to just one site in the world at Beinn Eighe National Nature Reserve in Wester Ross.
Ash trees: More than 80 per cent likely to be killed by a disease known as chalara.
The 13 wildlife targets Scottish National Heritage says Scotland is missing
Financial resources: “Total funding figures for most of the Scottish organisations that have some biodiversity remit have declined in the last five years.”
Sustainability: “We still have work to do to ensure the economy is operating within safe ecological limits.”
Habitat loss: “Some of Scotland’s habitats have suffered degradation and losses through changes in land use and management.”
Incentives: “There are incentives for activities which conflict with biodiversity leading to its deterioration and sometimes loss.”
Safeguarding ecosystems: “The overall measure shows Scotland’s natural capital deteriorated historically until the 1990s.”
– Vulnerable ecosystems: Uplands, peatlands, oak woodland, machair, saltmarsh, cold water corals, maerl beds, serpulid reefs, horse mussel and flame shell beds.
Preventing extinction: “There is a mixed picture from Scotland’s species indicators: with seabirds, waders, upland birds, and specialist butterflies in decline.”
Invasive species: "The spread of invasive non-native species and their impacts on biodiversity is a present and growing threat.”
Fish: “In the Celtic Seas eco-region, a number of stocks have very low biomasses and are not sustainable.”
Rural industries: “Insufficient progress” making agriculture, fish farming and forestry sustainable.
Pollution: “Much work remains to be done, with more challenging measures required to control air pollution and diffuse pollution, control marine litter, and better quantify the effects of pollution.”
Genetic diversity: “It would be premature to say we are on target.”
Improving knowledge: “More work is required to address data recording and analysis gaps.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel