The protection offered by two popular sunscreens has been found to plummet in testing conditions replicating swimming pools and the sea, a consumer group has warned.
Which? tested water resistance claims made by two sunscreens – one own-brand and one well-known branded product – and found the sun protection factor (SPF) fell by up to 59% after 40 minutes in salt water.
The watchdog declined to name the two sunscreens, but said they were both representative of the market.
Which? said its findings exposed serious flaws in the current testing regime, which requires a volunteer to be immersed in a bath of tap water that is circulated to simulate moderate activity.
It noted the current tests also allow manufacturers to claim a product is water resistant if the SPF drops by up to 50% after two 20-minute periods of immersion.
Which? carried out its own tests in salt water, chlorinated water and fast-moving water, which it said more closely resembled conditions holidaymakers encounter.
It found the branded product’s SPF dropped by 59% after 40 minutes of immersion in salt water and in moving water, while the own-brand product’s SPF dropped by 34% in both salt water and chlorinated water.
The consumer group said the current requirements for meeting water resistance claims were “unrealistic to the point of being meaningless”.
It warned there was no way for consumers to know what SPF they would end up with after going into the sea or pool when they bought a sunscreen.
Meanwhile, in separate tests Which? found that 15 widely available sunscreens included met their SPF claims.
Last year Which? labelled Avon’s Sun+ Multi Protection Moisturising Sun Lotion SPF30 a “Don’t Buy” as the product failed its SPF tests.
The sunscreen, which was not one of the 15 tested this year, continues to be a “Don’t Buy”’ as it has not been reformulated and is still available to buy, the watchdog said.
Nikki Stopford, Which? director of research and publishing, said: “Our research shows water resistant sunscreens don’t live up to their claims when subjected to rigorous tests – raising serious questions about the current guidelines.
“With 15,400 new cases of melanoma each year, manufacturers should be required to robustly test their products and make only claims that can be relied on, ensuring holidaymakers know they can trust their sunscreen to protect them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here