TEACHERS have issued a warning over the spread of CCTV cameras in schools.
While surveillance cameras are routinely used to monitor public areas, corridors or school grounds teachers are concerned about their use in the classroom.
In particular staff don’t want to see footage from cameras being used to judge the performance of school staff during lessons.
The issue will be discussed by members of the Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association (SSTA) at its annual congress later this month.
Read more: Vandal hit school fitted with CCTV
A motion to the congress from the union’s North Lanarkshire branch states: “The association accepts that surveillance CCTV improves the safety and security of the school building.
“The use of it, however, throws up other issues pertaining to the use of surveillance CCTV within the classroom.
“The association calls on all local authorities to ensure that such technologies are not to be used to gather data for performance management purposes or capability procedures.”
In 2012 it emerged that more than 200 schools across Britain were using CCTV cameras in pupils’ toilets or changing rooms.
Anti-surveillance campaigners who collated the figures warned the research raised serious questions about the privacy of schoolchildren.
Responses from 2,107 secondary schools showed there were a total of 47,806 cameras overall, including 26,887 inside school buildings - a camera for every 38 children.
In all, 90 per cent of schools had CCTV cameras, with an average of 24 cameras in each.
Seamus Searson, general secretary of the SSTA, said: “Protection of staff and pupils in corridors is obviously an area where it could be of used, but we are increasingly aware of council discussions around the spread of this sort of technology into other areas of the school.
“The authorities would say that CCTV in the classroom would be used to protect staff and pupils and provide video evidence in the event of a violent incident or a false allegation, but there is a fear that it opens the door to using it to assess teacher competence.
“If it were to be used against teachers in that way then there would be an uproar and we need to assess what these sort of proposals are really seeking to do and whether they could be misused.”
The SSTA will also consider a range of other motions at its annual congress including pay, workload and poor classroom behaviour.
Read more: CCTV does not mean Big Brother is watching
A motion from the union’s national executive warns that secondary teachers in Scotland are paid less than teachers in England as well as college lecturers north of the Border, who now earn up to £40,000.
The motion states: “Congress believes that the current inability to recruit sufficient quality applicants to fill available places on teacher training courses is entirely predictable and requires to be addressed urgently to prevent staffing difficulties in our schools becoming even worse. “Scotland’s pupils deserve to not have their education damaged by the inability of their schools to find subject specialists to fill vacancies.
“Congress therefore expects the Government and Cosla to recognise the valuable work that teachers play in society and to restore pay levels, undoing the damage caused by a number of years of pay cuts.”
The SSTA will discuss extending its current strategy of industrial action if there was a failure to restore the ‘true’ value of teacher salaries.
A further motion calls for a national strategy to deal with “unauthorised absenteeism, violent incidents and poor behaviour” which are having a “negative impact” on schools and creating “additional stress and workload for both pupils and teachers”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel