Theresa May has dodged questions about her own future in the wake of the Windrush scandal and deportation targets row as Labour turned up the heat over her role following Amber Rudd’s resignation from the Home Office and Sajid Javid’s appointment as her successor.
The Prime Minister, on the local election campaign trail in Manchester, was asked three times if the issues that led to Ms Rudd’s departure were also a resignation matter for her given she had set policy during her time at the Home Office. But she deflected the questions each time, stressing how the Windrush Generation were “part of us, they are British and...helped build this country”.
Downing Street rallied to Mrs May’s aid, also seeking to distance her from the row over the illegal immigrant deportation targets.
It said how a leaked Home Office memo did not set out a specific national target but an “aim over a non-specific period” to increase the number of deportations of illegal immigrants by 10 per cent. “It was not an in-year number-specific goal.”
VIDEO: Amber Rudd quits as Home Secretary as Windrush scandal and targets row proves too much
No 10 explained how a trawl of documents over the weekend to help prepare the Home Secretary for a Commons statement on Monday had mentioned officials’ “operational targets,” which she had been unaware of, and so, accepting she had unintentionally misled Parliament, had resigned in a phonecall to the PM.
Mrs May’s spokesman also stressed the PM, while at the Home Office was aware of deportation targets, which were part of a “performance matrix,” but once she “ceased to be Home Secretary, she would not have received any operational detail of that kind”.
Tory MPs were said to be “incandescent with rage” over what they saw as the key role in bringing down Ms Rudd through leaks by Home Office civil servants, whom she had previously blamed for putting process before individuals in the Windrush scandal.
WATCH: What is the Windrush scandal and why has Amber Rudd resigned?
At Westminster, Labour kept up the pressure on the Government, piling pressure on the PM.
Jeremy Corbyn claimed Ms Rudd had been a “human shield” for Mrs May, who now herself had “questions to answer”.
The Labour leader is expected to raise the Windrush scandal and deportation row at Prime Minister’s Questions tomorrow, after which the Opposition will lead a Commons debate on the subjects.
On Monday, Labour was successfully granted an Urgent Question on Windrush with Mr Javid, having only been in post a few hours, taking to the Commons dispatch box to pledge a “fair and humane” immigration policy.
He promised to “do right by the Windrush Generation” and made clear his urgent priority was do whatever it took to put things right.
The new Home Secretary, the first person from a black, Asian or minority ethnic community to hold one of the great offices of state, said his background - he is the son of a bus driver who came from Pakistan in the 1960s - meant he was “personally committed” to resolving the problem.
READ MORE: Sajid Javid appointed as new Home Secretary after Amber Rudd resigns
Diane Abbott for Labour called on Mr Javid to reinstate former protections from deportation, which Commonwealth citizens had enjoyed but which had been removed under Mrs May’s watch at the Home Office through the 2014 Immigration Act.
The SNP’s Joanna Cherry claimed it was the PM who had “created the fundamental reasons for the Windrush scandal” and warned that if policy changes were not made, then “we will have more disgraceful instances of maltreatment of people with every right to be in the UK”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel