PRISON chaplains fear intelligence gathering they do as part of the Prevent counter-terror strategy is putting their lives at risk.
One jailed extremist who has already threatened the lives of chaplains is Tanveer Ahmed convicted of a religiously-motivated murder. Ahmed is in the general population of Shotts prison where he mixes with other inmates.
The chaplains, who he has threatened, hope that keeping Ahmed in mainstream prison will help him reform.
However, we know that Ahmed has shown no remorse for a savage crime, has tried to radicalise other inmates, and he has previously used prison phones to tell followers in the outside world that he wants to see the elimination of enemies of Islam. His followers recorded his words and and posted them online.
The prison service did restrict phone use for a time, but he has been permitted to make calls again.
It is not illiberal to question the regime in which Ahmed is being kept, given the obvious level of threat he presents.
It’s not outwith the bounds of possibility that followers of Ahmed will be inspired to carry out copycat attacks and target prison staff.
The protection of life must be a priority. If Ahmed is a danger to others then why is he in general population? Why was he allowed to use phone calls to threaten others?
It is a sign of the decency of the chaplains that they wish to give him every opportunity to reform. His actions, however, raise fears that this is a man incapable of redemption.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here