CAMPAIGNERS have criticised plans to push forward with an “experimental” cull of hundreds of ravens.
Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) have granted a group of farmers and gamekeepers a five-year licence to kill 300 birds in Perthshire.
But raptor experts and RSPB Scotland said they were “extremely concerned” about the impact on the local raven population.
And concerns have also been raised over granting permission in the vicinity of an area, Strathbraan, with “an appalling and well-documented track record of illegal persecution of raptors”.
Police recently launched an appeal after a white tailed sea eagle vanished in suspicious circumstances nearby.
Robbie Kernahan, SNH’s head of wildlife, said he understood the concerns over wildlife crime – but insisted the granting of the licence was “wholly unconnected” to these fears.
He added: “This licence is about a pressing and complex conservation issue. It is a large-scale collaborative trial which will help improve our understanding of factors affecting key wader species, populations of which are declining at an alarming rate.
“We are satisfied this licence will not affect the population of ravens overall, and is over a five year period.”
SNH wants to study the reasons behind the plummeting number of wading birds, which ravens have been blamed for killing.
But academic research co-funded by SNH previously found ravens – which were persecuted by gamekeepers for centuries – should not be held responsible.
Duncan Orr-Ewing from RSPB Scotland said: “We are extremely concerned about the likely scale on impact of this research licence on the local raven population in the Strathbraan area of Perthshire.
“We are also very surprised that SNH has issued such a research licence in the vicinity of Strathbraan, which has an appalling and well documented track record of illegal persecution of raptors, noting also the very recent suspicious disappearance of a satellite tagged white-tailed eagle in this very same area.
“We, together with local raptor workers who have been monitoring ravens in the area for decades, could have helped SNH with this background detail to the licence application if we had been consulted.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel