RICHARD Leonard's call on his Westminster Labour colleagues to “get a move on” with plans for federalism has kickstarted a debate about devolution that was largely dormant.
The body politic in Scotland is crying out for a national conversation about how we can breathe fresh life into the devolution settlement.
At a time when a fractious Brexit debate is dominating political discourse at Westminster, any proposal that seeks to empower Scottish voters and the Holyrood parliament has to be welcomed.
Calling for a grown-up discussion about reshaping the British state, is not necessarily an endorsement of Leonard's particular brand of federalism or indeed that of any other politician advocating a similar approach.
Both before and after the 2014 referendum, it has been almost fashionable for some commentators to state their backing for "devo max", federalism or "home rule" as variants of a supposed third way between independence and an unreformed Unionism.
The problem was and is that such terms are so poorly defined that the debate has essentially stalled.
Sunday Herald readers are likely to be spectacularly unconvinced by spurious claims by the Conservative Party that the UK government has presided over a seismic shift in powers towards Scotland since September 18 2014.
While the jury remains out on whether Labour at UK and Scottish level will in time set out detailed plans for a federal UK, this newspaper is pleased Leonard has started an important civic debate.
The onus is now on Leonard and Jeremy Corbyn to state clearly what federalism will mean for Scotland and the rest of the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here