ONLY NHS Tayside has dipped into charity funds to shore up ailing finances, it has emerged.
Two others - NHS Highland and NHS Ayrshire and Arran - said they had transferred from their endowment funds into their general expenditure pots occasionally since 2012, but stressed that the money had been properly spent. Every other health board in Scotland said they had never done so.
Read more: NHS Tayside chief executive axed in wake of charity cash scandal
It comes after the chief executive and chairman of NHS Tayside were forced to step down after the Herald revealed that £2.7 had been taken from its charity pot in 2013/14 to cover routine costs after the health board ran out of money. The bulk of it - £2.3m - was spent retrospectively to fund new IT that should have been paid for from core NHS spending.
Yesterday, trustees of NHS Tayside endowment fund met to review that decision. In a statement, they said the review's conclusions will "form the basis of a response" to be sent at the end of this week to the Scottish charities regulator, OSCR, which is conducting its own inquiry into how NHs Tayside has managed the fund, which is made up of public donations and bequests to the NHS.
Read more: NHS Tayside suspended own rules to use charity cash for IT
Last week, Health Secretary Shona Robison also instructed NHS Scotland's chief executive Paul Gray to write to all health boards in the wake of the scandal to seek assurances that endowment monies were being spent appropriately.
Bob Brown, assistant finance director NHS Ayrshire and Arran, said it only used its charity fund to "provide extra comforts for patients over and above that provided by Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board".
In 2012, Mr Brown said the health board had transferred £800,000 from the exchequer - core NHS funding - into its endowment fund to support research into hospital infections. He added that some of this funding was subsequently transferred back into the exchequer from the charity fund when it was no longer required.
Read more: Holyrood committees asked to investigate how health boards spend charity cash
Mr Brown said: "This money was for the specific purpose of supporting HAI research within the Institute of Healthcare Associated Infection. In 2017 as part of a regular review of Charity Funds, the trustees agreed to return a balance of £184,000 to the exchequer as the fund was no longer required for its specified purpose."
A spokeswoman for NHS Highland said they did transfer cash from the endowment fund into the exchequer, but insisted that it was only ever done to support charitable projects and spent according to the wishes of donors.
In one example, the spokeswoman said around £1m raised through the Archie Foundation for the redevelopment of the children's ward at Raigmore hospital was used as a contribution towards the cost of the overall project.
She said: "This was entirely in line with what the Archie Foundation expected and in line with the constitution and financial procedures of the endowment fund."
However, NHS sources from various regions have told the Herald they have occasionally felt uncomfortable about how charity cash is spent, for example funding hotels for staff attending conferences or training courses.
It has also emerged that NHS Tayside gave more than £1000 in charity cash to a community biking project, Mike’s Bikes, run by a former drug addict. The organiser, Mike Rennie, subsequently vanished with no record of how the money was used.
Scottish Labour’s health spokesperson Anas Sarwar MSP said: “Labour has repeatedly called for an immediate and swift national investigation to ensure such behaviour is not going on elsewhere.
"Clearly there is a need for great transparency, scrutiny and accountability not just at NHS Tayside, but health boards across the country."
Scottish Conservative public health spokeswoman Annie Wells said: “Given the fiasco in Tayside over the use of charitable donations, this issue is certainly worth closer scrutiny.
“It’s pretty clear that health boards have to be extremely responsible and transparent when using these donations left in goodwill.
“If they’re not, people will lose confidence and will take their cash elsewhere in future.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel