The estate of To Kill A Mockingbird author Harper Lee has filed suit over an upcoming Broadway adaptation of the novel, arguing that screenwriter Aaron Sorkin’s script wrongly alters Atticus Finch and other characters from the book.
The suit, which includes a copy of a contract signed by Lee and dated about eight months before her death in February 2016, contends Sorkin’s script violates the agreement by portraying Finch, the noble lawyer who represents a black man wrongly accused of rape in Mockingbird, as someone else in the play.
Filed against the theatre company of New York producer Scott Rudin, the complaint cites an interview with the online publication Vulture in which Sorkin was quoted as saying the small-town lawyer would evolve from a racist apologist at the start of the show to become “Atticus Finch by the end of the play”.
Such a change during a play could fit with the character evolution shown between the Pulitzer Prize-winning Mockingbird and Lee’s first draft of the novel, finally released in 2015 as Go Set A Watchman.
But the lawsuit contends the script would violate the contact by changing Finch and other characters and adding still more people who aren’t in the novel. It asks a judge to enforce a section of the agreement that states the play will not “depart in any manner from the spirit of the Novel nor alter its characters”.
Harper Lee, author of To Kill A Mockingbird (Rob Carr/AP)
A firm that represents Mr Rudin’s company, Rudinplay Inc, said Sorkin’s script “is a faithful adaptation of a singular novel which has been crafted well within the constraints of the signed agreement” between the producers and Lee.
The statement also took a jab at the “history of litigious behaviour” of Lee’s estate, overseen by lawyer Tonja Carter of Lee’s south Alabama hometown of Monroeville.
“This is, unfortunately, simply another such lawsuit, the latest of many, and we believe that it is without merit,” said the statement. “While we hope this gets resolved, if it does not, the suit will be vigorously defended.”
The suit names as its plaintiff Ms Carter, who represented Lee during the final years of the author’s life. Ms Carter handled Lee’s will and is listed in the lawsuit as the personal representative of Lee’s estate.
Rudinplay paid Lee 100,000 US dollars (£71,500) after she approved Sorkin as the screenwriter in November 2015, the suit said. Ms Carter first saw a draft of the play in September, according to the lawsuit, and she later spoke with MrRudin by phone to express numerous concerns about Sorkin’s script.
“Mr Rudin assured Ms Carter that he wanted to do the Play right and that he would make sure that the Estate would be satisfied with the final product,” the suit said.
The two talked again in February about the script, the suit said, adding: “At times, the conversation was heated.” Ms Carter sued after Mr Rudin’s lawyer wrote earlier this month saying extensive changes to the script were not possible, the suit said.
Sorkin has won multiple Emmys for his work on the drama series The West Wing, and he won an Academy Award for his screenplay of The Social Network in 2011.
Mr Rudin’s credits include Lady Bird, which was nominated for an Academy Award as best motion picture this year, and Fences, which was a 2017 nominee. He won a best picture Oscar for No Country for Old Men in 2008.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here