CAMPAIGNERS are making a last-ditch effort to prevent the building of homes at the Culloden battlefield site which they say would cause “catastrophic and irrevocable damage”.
The Historians Committee On Culloden is calling on the Scottish Government to have “moral courage”
and intervene, amid claims officials approved planning permission after being given incorrect information.
A plan to build homes in the area was rejected in 2014 by Highland councillors, only to be then given permission by a Scottish Government reporter.
While that development did not transpire, Kirkwood Homes submitted a separate application for 16 homes at Viewhill Farm, with some revisions made over the last month.
However, historians feel the entire process must be reviewed because they claim information given to the Government Reporter for the 2014 application was inaccurate.
READ MORE: Call for archaeological investigation of Culloden Moor homes site
A spokesman for the group said: “There is a great deal of misinformation circulated about the Battle of Culloden Moor on April 16, 1746, not the least of which involves where it took place. It has been well established by historians and archaeologists for some years that the ground of conflict reached far north of B9006.
“Although this geography of the battle was known by most experts at the time, including Historic Scotland’s own research, the information supplied by Historic Scotland to the Government Reporter when he made his decision in favour of the development at Viewhill, reflected none of this knowledge.”
The dispute centres on whether the development’s location is atop an area that should be conserved due to its historical significance.
Members of the Historians’ Council insist the area of Viewhill Farm likely saw heavy casualties toward the end of the battle and that those who died would be “buried on site or allowed to rot there” and, as a result, the area should be considered part of the war grave of Culloden.
READ MORE: Call for archaeological investigation of Culloden Moor homes site
The historians further argue that “digging up of ground for utilities and foundations for 16 houses will result in catastrophic and irrevocable damage” to the Culloden site.
Approval of Kirkwood’s application was delayed in January to allow the developer to make design amendments that “better reflected” the development’s Highlands setting, and the Culloden (Battlefield) Conservation Area.
The matter will return before the council’s south planning applications committee tomorrow, with officers recommending the proposals be approved.
The Government said it would not comment on a live application.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here