The Government is expected to announce a review of the university funding system next week. Here are some of the key questions:
Why is the Government reviewing university funding?
Theresa May announced a review of university finance at the Conservative Party conference last autumn, pledging to “look again” at the system.
The Prime Minister’s announcement came amid growing debate about the current funding system, with concerns about issues such as whether students are getting value for money, and the impact of tuition fee debt on graduates.
The debate was sparked in part by a high-profile Labour Party general election pledge to scrap tuition fees for all future students.
What’s the current system?
In England, tuition fees stand at up to £9,250 a year for home and EU students.
Students can get government loans to cover their fees and living costs, which they repay after they have graduated and are in work.
At the time she promised a funding review, Mrs May also announced plans to freeze tuition fees at the current level, rather than allow them to increase with inflation.
She also said that the salary threshold for graduates to begin repaying loans would rise from £21,000 to £25,000.
Interest rates on loans now stand at up to 6.1% – which has sparked concerns from some quarters.
What’s the impact of the current system?
A study published by respected economic think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) last summer, before the Government announced the fee freeze and repayment changes, calculated that fees of £9,250 and interest rates of up to 6.1% would mean that the average student would owe more than £50,000 on graduation.
The IFS has also calculated that raising the repayment threshold to £25,000 will save some graduates up to £15,700 over a lifetime, but will add £2.3 billion to the annual cost of the sector to the taxpayer over the long term.
Freezing fees at £9,250 will reduce the debt of students coming into the system by just £800 and will save the Government £300 million.
What will the review look at?
The review is likely to be fairly wide-ranging and look at a number of issues – such as value for money.
It is likely to consider whether tuition fees could be cut or frozen, and whether changes could be made to interest rates on student loans.
What will it mean for students and universities?
That is the million dollar question, and rests on what the review finds.
University leaders have warned that funding for higher education needs to be stable and sustainable.
It has also been argued by some that any drop in funding – such as through a cut to tuition fees – would need to be made up from elsewhere.
The Russell Group, which represents 24 of the UK’s leading institutions, has said that changes to the system need to be fair and affordable for students, and still meet the needs of taxpayers and universities in providing a high-quality education.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel