KEZIA Dugdale has claimed she quit as Scottish Labour leader last year over unhappiness with the UK party’s position on Brexit.
The Lothians MSP told a private meeting of Labour colleagues that Jeremy Corbyn's stance on leaving the European Union – based on a perceived failure to fight a hard Brexit – was one of the factors behind her departure.
However, a senior party source said Dugdale’s claim was a “breathtaking attempt at rewriting history” and said she was “softening the ground” for leaving the party.
A spokesperson for Dugdale said: “Kez’s views on Brexit are long-standing and well known. She is passionate about preventing a hard Brexit and protecting jobs, the economy and workers’ rights. The Labour Party is the best vehicle for stopping a destructive Brexit in its tracks and we must all work together to stop the Tories from taking us down such a ruinous path.”
Labour has struggled to adopt an agreed position on Brexit due to the politically-difficult task of pleasing both pro-remain party members and voters who backed leave.
Corbyn, a lifelong Eurosceptic who said he voted remain, has backed continued membership of the single market, but only on a temporary basis.
Senior figures in the party want him to either back the UK staying in the single market permanently, or support a second referendum in the hope of overturning the result.
The row has spread to Scottish Labour, where new leader Richard Leonard has endorsed the Corbyn position and resisted demands to adopt a separate policy.
A summit was staged last week for Labour MSPs to debate Brexit and speak freely about the stance they believe the Scottish party should take.
Neil Findlay MSP, who is Leonard’s Brexit spokesman, is said to have made a presentation and contributions were made by colleagues.
An insider said Dugdale, who walked away as leader in August, was one of a number of MSPs who criticised the party’s position and called for a rethink.
She is said to have reiterated her call for a referendum on the final Brexit proposal and claimed that UK Labour’s position was a reason behind her decision to quit.
However, party colleagues are sceptical of Dugdale’s retrospective account of her abrupt departure.
Dugdale’s resignation statement made no reference to Brexit being a trigger and she instead suggested the death of friend Gordon Aikman had been a factor.
“Earlier this year I lost a dear friend who taught me a lot about how to live. His terminal illness forced him to identify what he really wanted from life, how to make the most of it and how to make a difference. He taught me how precious and short life was and never to waste a moment,” she wrote.
The statement also made a general reference to political events: “Emerging from the challenging times following the 2014 referendum, and the 2015 UK election, we now have a solid platform on which to build towards success, and government. I have given the task of achieving this all that I have.”
One party source said: “The real reason Kez quit is that she couldn’t be bothered any more. She wanted to spend more time with her partner and enjoy life. It was nothing to do with Labour’s position on Brexit.”
Another insider said: “It’s a breathtaking attempt at rewriting history. My view is that she is softening the ground for leaving us and sitting as an independent MSP."
However, a source close to Dugdale said it was “categorically” not the case she would leave the party.
Since quitting, Dugdale has taken aim at Corbyn’s performance during the EU referendum campaign.
“I also blame my party, the Labour Party, for a totally lazy and lacklustre remain campaign that got us here,” she wrote in November.
A Scottish Conservative spokesman said: “Once again we see Scottish Labour at sixes and sevens over Brexit. The party is in a state of disarray and this meeting shows that there are still deep divisions amongst the leadership and their elected members.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel