THE Scottish Government has defended itself against claims it “coerced” critics of its controversial plans to appoint a so-called state guardian for every child.
Deputy First Minister John Swinney said officials “engaged with a range of stakeholders” to try to understand their concerns over the Named Person scheme, “as is entirely right and proper”.
He was asked to explain why senior civil servants set up meetings with individuals and organisations due to give evidence to a Holyrood committee about the plans.
Labour MSP Johann Lamont, deputy convener of the education and skills committee, raised concerns over the meetings, which often occurred the week before witnesses were due to appear before MSPs and were “explicitly to discuss their evidence to this committee”.
She said this appeared “quite different from the Scottish Government routinely looking to meet stakeholders”.
Witnesses approached by the Scottish Government included representatives from Police Scotland and Colleges Scotland. Some changed their position on the back of the meetings.
The controversial Children and Young People (Information Sharing) Bill is currently caught up in lengthy delays after MSPs demanded more details over how it will operate.
In a letter to the committee, Education Secretary Mr Swinney said: "The Scottish Government believes it is good practice to engage widely with stakeholders in the preparation of legislation.
“This activity seeks to ensure that those with significant experience, knowledge and expertise in this area are heard, listened to and given the opportunity to continue to shape and influence legislation and policy which affects them and crucially, the children and families whom they support.”
Conservative MSP and committee member Oliver Mundell previously accused the Government of sending "attack dogs to coerce witnesses".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel