SCOTLAND's arts funding body is to hold an emergency board meeting following a storm of controversy over cuts to theatre and disabled arts groups.
Less than a week after Creative Scotland unveiled its three-year, £99m funding package for 116 arts organisations, it is to hold the board meeting this week, to discuss the fall-out from the decisions.
The funding body is to "take stock" of the decisions made in the suddenly urgent meeting, which has been brought forward from a scheduled date in mid-February.
Controversy over cuts to lauded theatre companies such as Catherine Wheels and Visible Fictions, who have lost all their Regular Funding (RFO) has been compounded by an outcry over similar cuts to disabled arts organisations Bird of Paradise, Lung Ha and Janice Parker Projects.
There has also been unease over cuts to the funding of music companies, including Dunedin Consort and Hebrides Ensemble.
The board meeting, chaired by interim chair Ben Thomson, will not affect the funding of the 116 organisations who last week received RFO funding, Creative Scotland's chief executive, Janet Archer, said.
However, it is possible the meeting may map out new funds for companies that have lost out.
The board will also discuss in detail the decision making that led to the current outcry, the largest since 2012, when Andew Dixon, chief executive, resigned over anger at Creative Scotland's policies and direction.
Ms Archer said: "We are listening carefully to everything everyone is saying.
"We're doing that through one to one meetings with organisations and correspondence directly with us.
"Given the strength of views being presented, we will be bringing forward the Creative Scotland Board meeting, originally scheduled for 15 February.
"At this meeting, we will be taking stock of the decisions made regarding organisations not included in the Regular Funding network, and the options available.
"We will make a further announcement as soon as we can next week, following this meeting."
She added: "It’s important to note that this will not affect any of the 116 organisations, or the transition arrangements, already announced as part of the network."
At the weekend, the culture minister, Fiona Hyslop, although re-iterating the "arms length" principle between the Scottish Government and Creative Scotland, noted: "A lot of angst and worry could be avoided if CS is clearer to children and disability theatre companies [about] its commitment and funding plans."
It is understood that is will be hard for the body to consider reversing its RFO funding decisions for a handful of companies.
The Touring Fund, a new and apparently annual £2m pot of cash for touring theatre companies, has also not been explained in detail.
Funding U-turns would possibly open the door to all companies that failed to land RFO status to seek re-adjudication, and the money required would put financial pressure on Creative Scotland, and possibly some of its other funds.
At the last board meeting, it was noted by some present that withdrawing funds from high profile companies such as Catherine Wheels and Birds of Paradise, would be received badly in the arts community, press and beyond - and so it has proved.
In the list of 116 companies funded for three years, 19 are new.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel