Julian Assange’s doctors have said that his health is at risk due to his six-year confinement in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
Sondra S Crosby, Brock Chisholm and Sean Love, writing on The Guardian’s website, said that they spent 20 hours over three days assessing Mr Assange’s condition.
Without giving any particular details, they said that his confinement has had an impact on his physical and mental health.
WikiLeaks founder Mr Assange has not stepped out of the Knightsbridge, west London, embassy since August 2012, when he was granted asylum by Ecuador.
He had breached his bail conditions amid sex-related allegations in Sweden for which he was due to be extradited.
Sweden dropped the investigation in May 2017 and applied to revoke the European arrest warrant.
However, he may still be arrested by UK police if he steps outside of the embassy for breaking his bail conditions in 2012.
“As clinicians, it is our ethical duty to advocate for the health and human rights of all people as promised under international law,” wrote the doctors.
“Experience tells us that the prolonged uncertainty of indefinite detention inflicts profound psychological and physical trauma above and beyond the expected stressors of incarceration.
“These can include severe anxiety, pathological levels of stress, dissociation, depression, suicidal thoughts, post-traumatic stress disorder and chronic pain, among others.
“It is unconscionable that Mr Assange is in the position of having to decide between avoiding arrest and potentially suffering the health consequences, including death, if a life-threatening crisis such as a heart attack were to occur.
“Further, our assessment reveals that he has had no access to sunlight, appropriate ventilation or outside space for over five and a half years.”
The doctors called for the British Medical Association (BMA) and other UK doctors to lobby the Government to provide healthcare for Mr Assange.
However, they also noted that most doctors are unwilling to go into the embassy to treat him.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here