RURAL doctors have voted overwhelmingly to reject the proposed new GP contract set to be introduced across Scotland.
Figures show that of the 74 out of 115 rural GPs who voted, 65 were opposed to the proposal.
The snub comes after The Herald told how Dr Iain Kennedy, a North Scotland GP representative on the BMA Scottish Council, warned that family doctors in the Highlands feel “completely betrayed” by the funding split at the heart of the new contract.
In a members’ survey carried out by the Rural GP Association of Scotland (RGPAS) and revealed by the Scotland On Sunday newspaper, 66 out of 74 doctors said they do not feel they have been adequately represented in the contract negotiations.
Dr David Hogg, chairman of the RGPAS, said they were still waiting to hear back from the Scottish GP Committee about concerns they have raised.
He added: “We would have expected greater assurance and clarity on how this contract is going to be implemented in rural areas and, without this, we have had to use our votes to indicate more thought must be given to rural-proofing the proposals.”
The new contract, set to be introduced this year, will hand partners an average windfall of £10,000 a year.
However, The Herald revealed an analysis of the contract’s workload- based funding allocation formula by Oban GP Dr Erik Jespersen showed only 68 per cent of GP partners will benefit, while the rest – largely in rural areas and some in Scotland’s most deprived practices – would get nothing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here