Hate crimes are more likely to be carried out when people are drunk, with the alcohol acting as an “igniter” to expressing prejudice, a study has found.
Researchers from Cardiff University interviewed people attending accident and emergency with injuries from violence in three multicultural British cities.
They found that 18.5% of the 124 patients considered themselves to have been attacked by people motivated by prejudice and that alcohol intoxication accounted for 90% of these attacks.
Professor Jonathan Shepherd, director of the Cardiff University Crime and Security Research Institute, said: “A striking aspect of the study was the discovery that most attacks weren’t fuelled by hate alone; alcohol appeared to act as an igniter.
“Our findings suggest that tackling alcohol abuse is not only important in regards to the health of individuals but also to the health of our society.
“Additionally, we have learned that emergency room violence surveys can act as a community tension sensor and early warning system.”
The survey was carried out in Cardiff, Blackburn and Leicester, with the cities chosen because all three are home to multicultural, multi-ethnic and multi-religious populations.
Of the 23 people who claimed the attack on them was motivated by prejudice, seven said they thought their appearance was the motive, five suggested racial tensions within the communities they lived, three mentioned their place of residence and eight cases were attributed to the race, religion or sexual orientation of the victims.
All 23 attacks took place away from the victims’ homes.
Many of them viewed limiting alcohol consumption as a good strategy to reduce the risk of attacks.
:: The research paper Injury resulting from targeted violence: An emergency department perspective is published in the Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health journal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel