The head of a Scottish Catholic Church's aid arm has said the Rohingya people are victims of "crimes against humanity".
The Muslim minority refugees fleeing violence in their home state of Rakhine in Burma describe soldiers and Buddhist leaders carrying out a systematic campaign of murder and burning villages, accusations which military leaders have denied.
Alistair Dutton, director of the Scottish Catholic International Aid Fund (Sciaf) which has raised more than £160,000 to help the refugees, said: "I don't know who's guilty of what but what has happened are crimes against humanity.
"The chopping people up, shooting them, burning bodies, torching villages, stealing belongings and driving people out their country - these are crimes against humanity whoever perpetrated them."
Speaking on a visit to the Kutupalong refugee camp in Bangladesh, Mr Dutton said: "There are an overwhelming number of reports. Everyone spoken to has seen or knew of someone who had family killed.
"I think if these reports were verified they would quite clearly be crimes against humanity."
Despite a recent agreement by the Bangladesh and Burmese government for repatriation, refugees continue to arrive, joining some 646,000 who have braved the dangerous border crossing since the surge in violence after Rohingya militants reportedly attacked border posts in August.
Mr Dutton warned the crisis could last for years, stressing that Sciaf and charity partner Caritas Bangladesh were planning for the long term as the average length of time a person spends as a refugee is 17 years.
He added: "We're here to help the Rohingya. No one should be under any illusion that the recent Memorandum of Understanding between Myanmar and Bangladesh signals the end of this massive humanitarian disaster.
"The exile of the Rohingya refugees will almost certainly last for years and we will be here for as long as it takes."
In early December around 30 refugees were arriving daily by boat from Burma to Shabrang Harbour at the Bangladesh border before being taken to the camp.
One mother who made the crossing earlier this month said she saw children burned to death by the military.
Razia Begum, 30, said: "I saw some little children who were killed by being burned by fire. I felt very horrible because I did not know how I could protect my children and so I left for another place."
She said she had no food, money or way to survive in Bangladesh without help and aid donations but said she added "here I have shelter and I have peace".
Another new arrival, seven-year-old Noor Karima, saw her mother and father killed in front of her and escaped to cross the border with her aunt.
Samara Besam, 25, who travelled with her three-year-old son, spent a month in hiding near the Burma border before the day-long crossing to arrive at Shabrang and said she would not return.
She said: "The military and Buddhist leaders tortured us. Why would we go back to Myanmar when there is no peace?
"They killed us and burned our houses. Why would we go back when there is no shelter?"
Senowara Begum, 18, now living at the Kutupalong camp, said Buddhists and the military burnt their homes, killed the young men and tortured women and girls but said she would return if the Bangladesh government "can ensure the peace".
She said: "I want to have peace in Myanmar so we can go back. The Myanmar government has to give the Rohingya rights.
"They have to give us compensation - to return our cows, goats and chickens and give us back our livelihood."
But another resident of the camp, Muhamed Ali, told of his father sacrificing himself to save his family and being "chopped into pieces" by soldiers.
The 28-year-old said he would prefer to die in Bangladesh than be sent back to his homeland without the creation of Rohingya state with rights and citizenship.
He added: "The whole world should pressure Myanmar to agree these terms. If this doesn't happen we will go anywhere where we can find peace.
"If the Bangladesh government sends us back without any proper settlement, I would say that they should just kill us right here. We would be happier to die here than back in Myanmar."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here