TEACHERS have called for traditional school inspections to be scrapped.
The Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union said the current regime did not help schools improve and could be negative and stressful for staff.
Instead, the EIS wants to see inspection body Education Scotland spend its time supporting schools to get better.
The call came in a written submission to the Scottish Parliament’s education committee, which is scrutinising the role of Education Scotland.
The submission said: “The EIS would suggest inspection statistics might suggest the need for a more strongly supportive approach and possibly the abandonment of formal inspection altogether in favour of a model designed solely to provide support to teachers and educational establishments.
“While some EIS representatives in schools report that members find the inspection process supportive, significant numbers express negative views.
“These centre on the damage done to staff morale by the manner in which the process is conducted, the excessive workload and stress that inspection can generate, poor quality of professional dialogue with inspectors, sometimes confusing and contradictory feedback, and the questionable utility of the process and findings in genuinely supporting improvement.”
The EIS also said there was no right of redress for schools or teachers who felt aggrieved by inspection reports.
Gayle Gorman, the new chief inspector of schools, will give evidence to the committee on the future role of the body next week.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel