THE race to become Rector of Aberdeen University has been marred by a "dirty tricks" campaign forcing university bosses to order a new vote.
It comes amid allegations that supporters of one of the candidates – sitting rector Scottish Greens co-convenor Maggie Chapman – were involved in tearing down campaign posters of her rivals vying for the post.
A smaller number of election posters of all candidates are believed to have been stripped from the walls, it is understood.
The university is believed to have found widespread breaches of electoral rules prompting a decision to re-run the election.
But the move condemned Ms Chapman's campaign team who strongly deny any wrongdoing and said there was no evidence to support the claims.
They insisted it was "much more likely" the complaints were a ruse to annul the election and the decision undermined "the votes cast by students in good faith for all candidates".
They further called for the results to be released in the interests of "democratic transparency".
The ancient post of Rector of the University of Aberdeen has a rich tradition dating back to the foundation of the institution in 1495 and has been held by notables such as former Prime Ministers Winston Churchill and Herbert Henry Asquith, steel industrialist Andrew Carnegie and actor Iain Cuthbertson.
The Rector since 1860 was the students' only representative, and, in more recent years, their main representative on the University Court.
A university spokeswoman said: “Following consideration of an appeal in regard to the Rectorial election, the Elections Committee have agreed to declare the election null and void and to re-run the election in the New Year. Further information on the timing of the election and the call for nominations will be issued in due course.”
Ms Chapman's opponents were University of Aberdeen alumnus Andrew Bowie, the MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, student Angus Hepburn, from Kippen, near Stirling and the singer, broadcaster and producer Fiona Kennedy.
Ms Chapman's campaign team said the allegations were not a strong reason to annul the election and "undermines the votes cast by students in good faith for all candidates".
They said it remained clear to everyone that the Scottish Green Party co-convenor had won and that the election process was sound, with no suggestion of vote-rigging, voter intimidation, or impersonation.
"In any other circumstances, the result would be announced," a campaign source said. We call on the university to not disregard the valid votes of students, to respect democratic transparency, and release the result.
"We are in this situation because on the last afternoon of campaigning, having concluded they couldn’t win the election on their own merits, the losing campaigns chose to go, mob-handed, to pressurise the Returning Officer into disqualifying their opponent.
"They failed to do this but did manage to convince him to annul the election. This decision undermines the votes cast by students in good faith for all candidates. To protect these students, we appealed this decision."
Green co-convenors Patrick Harvie and Maggie Chapman unveiled the party's 2016 manifesto last . Picture by Gordon Terris.
The team said said it seemed more likely that the wind and rain were responsible for the loss of many of the posters, caused by a decision to stick them to lampposts with sellotape.
The campaign source added: "The losing campaign teams claim that hundreds of posters had been removed by our campaign team without anyone witnessing this. During the appeal process, it became clear that NO evidence was provided by these campaign teams to evidence their allegation that posters had been ripped down. We would like to make it clear that, much as we might wish to be, we are not ninjas.
"The contention that we had removed hundreds of campaign posters is obviously spurious, and their claim that it took until 4pm on the 11th day of campaigning - one hour before voting closed - for them to realise this is obviously absurd.
"It suggests that it is much more likely that their intention was to find a pretext to get the winning candidate disqualified or to have the election annulled."
The campaign team said they were "very confident" that students will back Ms Chapman in the re-vote.
"Maggie’s campaign team will keep fighting to make sure we have a Rector that really works for students and want to make it clear to students that their vote will count, and that we will do all we can to make sure that this is the case," said the campaign source.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel