Theresa May’s efforts to secure Brexit progress were labelled a “shambles” in the Commons as John Bercow sought to avoid a “spat” between MPs.
Labour’s Peter Kyle criticised the Prime Minister for returning “empty-handed” following the conclusion of lunchtime talks in Brussels between her and European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker.
But Conservative David Davies, MP for Monmouth, dismissed this assessment and insisted the Europeans would be empty-handed if “they don’t get their hands off our £50 billion”.
Video: DUP vows to block any move that "separates" Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK
Speaker Mr Bercow urged MPs to remain patient and noted a Commons statement on the latest talks was expected from the Government on Tuesday, as he warned against the exchanges turning into a “spat”.
Raising a point of order, Mr Kyle said of the latest talks: “This is a shambles that puts into perspective the constitutional settlement for our country here.
“Can we expect her (Mrs May) to make a statement tomorrow?”
Mr Bercow replied: “It had been very much my expectation in any event that there would be a statement to this House this week.
“Though I cannot predict with certainty, I had anticipated and been given reason to believe that it would likely be tomorrow.”
Mr Davies, in a further point of order, added: “The news is actually that Juncker is confident there will be a deal next week.
“Is it not wrong to say she’s coming back empty-handed when there’s almost certainly going to be a deal?
“Is it not the Europeans who are going to be empty-handed if they don’t get their hands off our £50 billion?”
Video: DUP vows to block any move that "separates" Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK
Mr Bercow replied: “I understand the impatience of (Mr Davies) but we mustn’t allow this to become a spat between people who want to say all is well and those who want to say all is ill.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here